2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2012.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation tests of roll-over protection structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results have shown the model's capacity and justified its application to generic types of robotic construction systems (Yoo et al 2012). A method based on strength tests for protective structures for construction equipment to prevent roll-over has been presented (Karliński et al 2013).…”
Section: Robotics and Manipulators For Safetymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The results have shown the model's capacity and justified its application to generic types of robotic construction systems (Yoo et al 2012). A method based on strength tests for protective structures for construction equipment to prevent roll-over has been presented (Karliński et al 2013).…”
Section: Robotics and Manipulators For Safetymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In fields other than the agriculture, Karlinski, Rusinski, and Smolnicki (2008), Karlinski, Ptak, and Działak (2013) and Derlukiewicz, Karlinski, and IIuk (2010) developed approaches, based on finite element analysis, for mining vehicle protective structures, which led to the possibility of using numerical simulation to design protective structures. Aiming to provide information helping in the design and evaluation of ROPSs without a systematic destructive test, Clark, Thambiratnam, and Perera (2006), Thambiratnam, Clark and Perera (2009) and Perera, Thambiratnam and Clark (2011) conducted experimental and numerical dynamic impact analysis on a construction machine ROPS.…”
Section: Protective Structure Design and Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last sub-phases are that of the structural validation of the ROPS/TOPS structure by means of the finite element method and subsequent analysis ( [34]), applying the sequence of tests provided by the standard of phase 2. In this sub-phase, the designer evaluates the deflection-limiting volume as intrusion/unprotecting in a suitable way ( [35]), simulating the elastic and plastic behavior of the steel material. If the structural validation fails, the virtual prototyping restarts from the protective structure virtual model, which updates iteratively.…”
Section: Protective Structure Designmentioning
confidence: 99%