The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Norchip 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/norchip.2010.5669472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of thermal behavior for Networks-on-Chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, ∆t Activity of reactive management is in the range of milliseconds (see example in section Reactive Approach) for reasonable sizes of NoC-tiles, so that the time saving per notification of activity (instead of waiting for a temperature change) may also be in the range of milliseconds (if ∆t compute is kept accordingly short). As it can be seen in (Wegner, Cornelius, Gag, Tockhorn, & Uhrmacher, 2010) this assumption is justified, since temperature modeling of a 2x2 NoC over 1 ms (using the same modeling accuracy as here) takes roughly 8.5 s. This results in 8.5 ms for every µs for four identical NoC-tiles and 2.125 ms for a single NoC tile (linearity assumed). For comparison, τ th for this example amounts to 6.3 ms. Due to a reduced ∆t Res and lowered traffic load, proactive management additionally implies two possible advantages compared to reactive approaches, provided that temperature can be influenced positively.…”
Section: Proactive Approachmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, ∆t Activity of reactive management is in the range of milliseconds (see example in section Reactive Approach) for reasonable sizes of NoC-tiles, so that the time saving per notification of activity (instead of waiting for a temperature change) may also be in the range of milliseconds (if ∆t compute is kept accordingly short). As it can be seen in (Wegner, Cornelius, Gag, Tockhorn, & Uhrmacher, 2010) this assumption is justified, since temperature modeling of a 2x2 NoC over 1 ms (using the same modeling accuracy as here) takes roughly 8.5 s. This results in 8.5 ms for every µs for four identical NoC-tiles and 2.125 ms for a single NoC tile (linearity assumed). For comparison, τ th for this example amounts to 6.3 ms. Due to a reduced ∆t Res and lowered traffic load, proactive management additionally implies two possible advantages compared to reactive approaches, provided that temperature can be influenced positively.…”
Section: Proactive Approachmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The authors in [6] propose heterogeneous modeling of synchronous reactive programs together with differential equations for modeling physical phenomena. VulcaNoCs [7] allows for modeling the functional behavior of Networks-on-Chips with cycle accurate SystemC-TLM, and relies on the Electrical Linear Network model of computation provided by SystemC-AMS [8] to implement the RC-Circuit modeling the thermal behavior. VulcaNoCs targets proactive thermal management.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of large computational power required for numerical simulators, in addition to detailed knowledge of the hardware as well as software make this approach unfeasible for design space exploration. A System-C based thermal simulator has recently been reported, but suffers from the same basic limitation as other simulators: the level of detailed information required for setting up the model is not easily available, see [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%