Simulation of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument Aerosol Index using the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System Aerosol Reanalysis Products

Abstract

Abstract. We provide an analysis of the commonly used Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aerosol index (AI) product for qualitative detection of the presence and loading of absorbing aerosols. In our analysis, simulated top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiances are produced at the OMI footprints from a model atmosphere and aerosol profile provided by the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS-5) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications aerosol reanalysis (MERRAero). Having established the credibility of the MERRAero simulation of the OMI AI in a previous paper we describe updates in the approach and aerosol optical property assumptions. The OMI TOA radiances are computed in cloud-free conditions from the MERRAero atmospheric state, and the AI is calculated. The simulated TOA radiances are fed to the OMI aerosol retrieval algorithms, and its retrieved AI (OMAERUV AI) is compared to the MERRAero calculated AI. Two main sources of discrepancy are discussed: one pertaining the OMI algorithm assumptions of the surface pressure, which are generally different from what the actual surface pressure of an observation is, and the other related to simplifying assumptions in the molecular atmosphere radiative transfer used in the OMI algorithms. Surface pressure assumptions lead to systematic biases in the OMAERUV AI, particularly over the oceans. Simplifications in the molecular radiative transfer lead to biases particularly in regions of topography intermediate to surface pressures of 600 hPa and 1013.25 hPa. Generally, the errors in the OMI AI due to these considerations are less than 0.2 in magnitude, though larger errors are possible, particularly over land. We recommend that future versions of the OMI algorithms use surface pressures from readily available atmospheric analyses combined with high-spatial resolution topographic maps and include more surface pressure nodal points in their radiative transfer lookup tables.

Temporal Characterization of Dust Activity in the Central Patagonia Desert (Years 1964–2017)

“…The difference of the logarithms of both ratios (and multiplied by −100) constitutes the UVAI. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of using the positive values of UVAI to detect the presence of absorbing aerosols (Buchard et al, ; Colarco et al, ; Herman & Celarier, ; Hsu et al, ; Zhang et al, ). One particular feature of the UVAI is its sensitivity to absorbing aerosols over bright backgrounds, such as semiarid and arid regions and clouds.…”

Stratospheric Injection of Massive Smoke Plume From Canadian Boreal Fires in 2017 as Seen by DSCOVR‐EPIC, CALIOP, and OMPS‐LP Observations

“…The prognostic aerosol module of the weather‐and‐climate capable National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) global Earth system model (Molod et al, 2015; Rienecker et al, 2008) was used to simulated the pyroCb‐triggered injections of August 2017. It is based on the Goddard Chemistry, Aerosol, Radiation, and Transport module (Chin et al, 2002, 2009; Colarco et al, 2010) that accounts for the emissions, and dry and wet losses for seven aerosol species including black carbon (BC) and brown carbon (BrC, Colarco et al, 2017). Aerosol species are treated as external mixtures that are transported online and are radiatively coupled in the GEOS atmospheric general circulation model.…”

Characterization of smoke and dust episode over West Africa: comparison of MERRA-2 modeling with multiwavelength Mie–Raman lidar observations

“…For SS, SU, and the hydrophilic portion of carbonaceous aerosol, hygroscopic growth is considered following Chin et al (2002) , with growth factors from OPAC ( Gerber, 1985 ). The RI for organic carbon is based on the 100 % brown carbon case from Hammer et al (2016) and it is implemented as described in Colarco et al (2017) .…”