1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(97)00022-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of the dynamic response of concrete beams externally reinforced with carbon-fiber reinforced plastic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a non-contact linear-proximity measuring system [7,11], high speed camera [7,12], accelerometers [4,7]. Here, accelerometers were used to determine the loading point displacement.…”
Section: Determination Of the Loading Point Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a non-contact linear-proximity measuring system [7,11], high speed camera [7,12], accelerometers [4,7]. Here, accelerometers were used to determine the loading point displacement.…”
Section: Determination Of the Loading Point Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators who studied the behaviour of concrete beams under impact loads (Banthia, et al [3]; and Jerome and Ross [4]) also recognised that during the initial period of the impact event, the load measured by the striker and that resisted by the specimen were not identical. They found that the dynamic failure loads measured from the test to be substantially higher than the member capacity (Jerome and Ross [4]). Some researchers reported a ten-fold difference between the recorded impact load on the concrete beams and the beams static load-carrying capacity (Hibbert [20]).…”
Section: Number Of Hitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the impact load measured on the striker and that applied to the specimen was attributed to specimen inertial effects. There were also some attempts to differentiate the recorded impact load from the inertia effects, assuming that part of the impact load from the striker was absorbed by inertia forces in the impacted body (Venzi [1]; Gopalaratnam, et al [2]; Banthia, et al [3]; Jerome and Ross [4]). They evaluated the equivalent mass of the specimen contributing in the response and multiplied it by the recorded striker acceleration, to produce the time history of the inertia force in the impacted member.…”
Section: Number Of Hitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of this research was dedicated to static conditions and only few works looked into the dynamic aspects of the failure mechanism. In one of the first works that did address dynamic aspects, Jerome and Ross (1997) examined the response of a strengthened beam to a weight drop loading and numerically addressed the response using finite element (FE) analysis. The FRP strip was modeled using truss elements and the concrete substrate was modeled using 2D plane-stress element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%