2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of temperature distribution in single metallic powder layer for laser micro-sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They introduced a unique simulation technique in an attempt to reproduce the complexity created with considering several powder layers. Yin et al [5] developed a simulation of the temperature distribution for laser micro-sintering (LMS). They analyzed the effect of laser power, beam size, scan speed on the temperature reached and the geometry of the melt pool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They introduced a unique simulation technique in an attempt to reproduce the complexity created with considering several powder layers. Yin et al [5] developed a simulation of the temperature distribution for laser micro-sintering (LMS). They analyzed the effect of laser power, beam size, scan speed on the temperature reached and the geometry of the melt pool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laser melting process, the powder material is completely melted and solidified, as opposed to laser sintering processes where metal powder material is sintered, or partially melted [5,8,11]. Both groups of processes utilize similar operational set-ups typically requiring a high power fiber laser source, a beam delivery lens system, a scanning mirror, a metal powder supply, a recoater roller or blade, and a build platform, (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physically-based modeling, like finite element analysis (FEA) simulation, has been applied to simulate thermal field evolution as well as calculating the local cooling rates [7]. The previous thermal field simulation researches mainly focused on the 1D model like a single track [49,50] or the 2D model like a single layer [51][52][53]. Although 1D and 2D FEA models have advantages in saving computation time and illustrating the key characteristics, a 3D model can better reflect the actual AM processes by considering the interaction among layers [54].…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, length (in the scan direction), depth, width, and area values are sometimes used to relate to process parameters. Often in AM modeling literature, a plot of the melt-pool temperature vs. some cross-section distance is given [119], [138]- [140]. Melt-pool size may be inferred and related to input parameters, though it is not often expressed as a single-value measurand (e.g., the melt-pool is x mm).…”
Section: Parameter-signature-quality Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%