Simulation of multiphase flow in fractured reservoirs using a fracture-only model with transfer functions

Abstract

We present a fracture-only reservoir simulator for multiphase flow: the fracture geometry is modeled explicitly, while fluid movement between fracture and matrix is accommodated using empirical transfer functions. This is a hybrid between discrete fracture discrete matrix modeling where both the fracture and matrix are gridded and dual-porosity or dual-permeability simulation where both fracture and matrix continua are upscaled. The advantage of this approach is that the complex fracture geometry that controls the main flow paths is retained. The use of transfer functions, however, simplifies meshing and makes the simulation method considerably more efficient than discrete fracture discrete matrix models. The transfer functions accommodate capillary-and gravity-mediated flow between fracture and matrix and have been shown to be accurate for simple fracture geometries, capturing both the early-and late-time average behavior. We verify our simulator by comparing its predictions with simulation results where the fracture and matrix are explicitly modeled. We then show the utility of the approach by simulating multiphase flow in a geologically

On the Analysis and Numerical Formulation of Miscible Fluid Flow in Porous Media Using Chebyshev Wavelets Collocation Method

“…The various parameter values necessary for describing the flow dynamics can be measured or estimated for the medium of choice and the occupying fluids. In this study, parameters for the numerical simulation of the flow problem were taken from Unsal et al [34]. Chosen parameter values are for oil as the fluid phase flowing through a porous medium.…”

“…In order to determine the appropriate conditions of operations as well as the machinery to use for the P. Amoako-Yirenkyi et al 1211 various operations and jobs, a number of parameters and the governing equations have to be predicted accurately. Several of the cases assumed that the flow follows a Darcy's law [6]- [8] which was the fundamental principle used to describe the flow of fluids in a reservoir; however, some researchers have extended their work to nonDarcy flow [2]- [4] [9]. The flow in porous media has been studied by several authors using methods like the Implicit Pressure Explicit Saturation (IMPES) method [10]- [13], fully implicit method [14] [15], the finite volume method [16], cell-centered finite difference method [17], discontinuous Galerkin Method [18], and sequential methods [15] [19] [20].…”

Comparison of Three FE-FV Numerical Schemes for Single- and Two-Phase Flow Simulation of Fractured Porous Media

“…However, this formulation suffers from instability and time step limitation specially for the model containing small elements (Matthäi et al 2010). The scheme is implemented in and the equations are solved using CSMP++ which is an object-oriented application programmer interface (API), designed for the simulation of complex subsurface processes and their interactions Zaretskiy et al 2010;Geiger et al 2010;Unsal et al 2010;Paluszny and Zimmerman 2011).…”

Fully Coupled Nonlinear Fluid Flow and Poroelasticity in Arbitrarily Fractured Porous Media: A Hybrid‐Dimensional Computational Model

“…This model can be reduced to a discrete fracture model, which is appropriate when the system is dominated by highly conductive fractures, or the porous matrix is nearly impermeable (e.g., Erhel et al, ; Hyman et al, ). The model can also be modified by using empirical (Unsal et al, ) or averaged (Sandve et al, ) matrix flow for beneficiary trade‐off between accuracy and efficiency. Since fractures often occur at multiple length scales, the discrete fracture‐matrix model becomes computationally demanding if all fractures are to be resolved.…”