2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of metastable changes in time resolved photoluminescence of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells upon light soaking treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, more complex kinetic models have been developed that incorporate the effects of carrier trapping/detrapping processes at defect states close to the conduction band, 32,33 including some that consider energetic and/or spatial distributions of defect states. 37,41 These models suggest that the long decay time observed by TRPL can either be attributed to SRH recombination (as in the simple picture described above) or by the characteristic time for the SRH recombination process modified by electron capture and release from the defect states, τ decay = (τ e /τ c ) × τ SRH . In the latter case, the estimated carrier capture (τ c ) and emission (τ e ) times for the ca.…”
Section: Discussion Of Carrier Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, more complex kinetic models have been developed that incorporate the effects of carrier trapping/detrapping processes at defect states close to the conduction band, 32,33 including some that consider energetic and/or spatial distributions of defect states. 37,41 These models suggest that the long decay time observed by TRPL can either be attributed to SRH recombination (as in the simple picture described above) or by the characteristic time for the SRH recombination process modified by electron capture and release from the defect states, τ decay = (τ e /τ c ) × τ SRH . In the latter case, the estimated carrier capture (τ c ) and emission (τ e ) times for the ca.…”
Section: Discussion Of Carrier Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…15.4 ± 3.3 ns (Initial) and 40 ± 10 ns (DH1000). Using the range of published electron capture cross sections of CIGS (1.0−50 × 10 −14 cm 2 ), 31,37,40,41 we estimate the density of SRH recombination centers to be in the ranges ca. (0.03−1.5) × 10 14 cm −3 (Initial) and ca.…”
Section: Discussion Of Carrier Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, trapping of minority carriers has also been proposed to influence the measured decay tail time 25–27 , which was mainly motivated by a strong temperature dependence of the decay tail time 26 . While trapping was included into the model presented in 27 , no temperature dependent transients were measured. Redinger et al .…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experimental evidence has been presented that trapping of minority charge carriers may impact these measured lifetimes, which results in measured effective lifetimes larger than the bulk lifetime [6,7]. These trapping states are incorporated into several simulation models presented in literature to describe experimental data [8,9]. The main experimental evidence for trapping is a temperature dependence of the measured photoluminescence (PL) decay times, which cannot be explained by the temperature dependence of Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) recombination [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%