2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-0256(02)00398-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of martensitic transformations in TRIP-steel and Fe-based shape memory alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several mechanical models have also been developed in Refs. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] based on the works of Reisner and Fischer.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mechanical models have also been developed in Refs. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] based on the works of Reisner and Fischer.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these experimental efforts, numerical developments are required to help expedite the design cycle for Fe-Mn-Si devices. Contrary to NiTi and Cu-based SMAs that have been intensively investigated numerically (Cissé et al, 2016a, 2016b), very few constitutive models are available for Fe-SMAs, with most still limited to uniaxial formulations and/or simulations (Cissé et al, 2015; Goliboroda et al, 1999; Lazghab and Wu, 2005; Nishimura et al, 2003). Existing three-dimensional (3D) models for Fe-based SMAs either consider linear hardening during inelastic deformations (Jemal et al, 2009) or loose their accuracy in the presence of plastic deformation despite the nonlinear hardening (Khalil et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They describe the effect of inelastic strain induced by martensitic phase transformation and plastic gliding and are more adapted to transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) steels. A few models dealing with the Fe-based SMA behavior are beginning to emerge (Goliboroda et al, 1999; Hartl and Lagoudas, 2009; Jemal et al, 2009; Lazghab and Wu, 2005; Nishimura et al, 1997, 2003; Nishimura and Tanaka, 1998) although most have been formulated for a one-dimensional case. Only Hartl and Lagoudas (2009) and Jemal et al (2009) have proposed a three-dimensional formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%