2015
DOI: 10.5194/ascmo-1-1-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of future climate under changing temporal covariance structures

Abstract: Abstract. A growing body of evidence indicates that anthropogenic greenhouse gases are changing Earth's climate, and that those changes may involve not only changes in climatic means but also in variability. Climate models may be informative about these future changes, but their use is complicated by the fact that they do not capture variability in current climate well. Many methods have therefore been developed to combine models and data in simulations of future climate, but current methods generally account … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 2 decades, numerous studies have sought to identify changes in temperature extremes both in observations (Easterling et al, 2000;Shaby and Reich, 2012;Parey et al, 2013;Westra et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2014;Naveau et al, 2014) and in general circulation model (GCM) simulations of future climate (Kharin and Zwiers, 2000;Tebaldi et al, 2006;Kharin et al, 2007;Sterl et al, 2008;Frías et al, 2012;Kharin et al, 2013). A number of studies find that extreme changes follow closely with changes in means and standard deviations (e.g., de Vries et al, 2012;Parey et al, 2013).…”
Section: W K Huang Et Al: Temperature Extremes In Ccsm3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past 2 decades, numerous studies have sought to identify changes in temperature extremes both in observations (Easterling et al, 2000;Shaby and Reich, 2012;Parey et al, 2013;Westra et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2014;Naveau et al, 2014) and in general circulation model (GCM) simulations of future climate (Kharin and Zwiers, 2000;Tebaldi et al, 2006;Kharin et al, 2007;Sterl et al, 2008;Frías et al, 2012;Kharin et al, 2013). A number of studies find that extreme changes follow closely with changes in means and standard deviations (e.g., de Vries et al, 2012;Parey et al, 2013).…”
Section: W K Huang Et Al: Temperature Extremes In Ccsm3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCM output used is part of an ensemble of climate simulations completed by the Center for Robust Decision Making on Climate and Energy Policy (RDCEP) (e.g., Castruccio et al, 2014;Leeds et al, 2015), using the Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3) , a fully coupled model with full representation of the atmosphere (CAM3), land (CLM3), sea ice (CSIM5) and ocean (POP 1.4.3) components. The model was run at the relatively coarse T31 spatial resolution (3.75 • × 3.75 • grid) (Yeager et al, 2006), which made the lengthy runs used here possible.…”
Section: Gcm Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leeds et al (2013) have done work on simulating future climate under changing covariance structures. They discuss forcing by spatial stochastic processes with thicker tails than the spatial white noise processes used by, for example Kim and North (1992) in their spherical energy balance model.…”
Section: Bifurcations and Tipping Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later versions of spherical spatial energy balance models used by have polar ampli…cation e¤ects. We believe that a useful direction for future research would be to include the bifurcation possibility of Abbot et al (2011) and the resulting impact on damages across space and to compare the changing spatial covariance structure that results with the …ndings of Leeds et al (2013). In the same context designing an optimal "Tech Fix" path to a sustainable low carbon economy is an area of promising future research (David and van Zon, 2014) 8 Appendix 8.1 Appendix I: The Case of Additive Uncertainty While we believe that the case of multiplicative uncertainty that we treated in the main text does a better job of re ‡ecting the model uncertainty, i.e.…”
Section: Bifurcations and Tipping Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 1, bottom row, our proposed method, unlike simple bias correction or the Delta method, both accounts for the relevant changes projected by the cartoon model and retains other distributional properties of the observations. Our method reduces to the Delta method in the case that the model predicts no changes in variability, and reduces to the method in Leeds et al (2015) if the past and future climates are both in equilibrium. Since such a simulation uses projected changes in covariances from a GCM, our methodology must provide a way of modeling and estimating these changes in transient GCM runs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%