2016
DOI: 10.1214/16-aoas903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperatures in transient climates: Improved methods for simulations with evolving temporal covariances

Abstract: Future climate change impacts depend on temperatures not only through changes in their means but also through changes in their variability. General circulation models (GCMs) predict changes in both means and variability; however, GCM output should not be used directly as simulations for impacts assessments because GCMs do not fully reproduce present-day temperature distributions. This paper addresses an ensuing need for simulations of future temperatures that combine both the observational record and GCM proje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical emulation of internal variability may also be advantageous in the context of ESMs when the cost of conducting a sufficiently large LE is prohibitive; for example, in the case of models with increased spatial resolution and/or complexity (discussed further below in the sub-section titled 'Designing future initial-condition LEs'). These statistical emulation methods will need to take into account any projected changes in internal variability 60 .…”
Section: Multi-model Les As Methodological Testbeds For Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical emulation of internal variability may also be advantageous in the context of ESMs when the cost of conducting a sufficiently large LE is prohibitive; for example, in the case of models with increased spatial resolution and/or complexity (discussed further below in the sub-section titled 'Designing future initial-condition LEs'). These statistical emulation methods will need to take into account any projected changes in internal variability 60 .…”
Section: Multi-model Les As Methodological Testbeds For Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tools under active development like the Observational Large Ensemble (McKinnon et al, 2017; McKinnon & Deser, 2018), enable scientists to assess a large ensemble's internal variability vis‐à‐vis a comparable estimate of observed variability. While an observational large ensemble does not position an evaluation of a large ensemble's future variability, it could, in combination with estimates of nonstationary variability from a large ensemble itself (e.g., Poppick et al, 2016). Increasingly, climate scientists are combining analyses of large and multimodel ensembles in an effort to better attribute uncertainty in impacts analyses (see, e.g., https://usclivar.org/working-groups/large-ensemble-working-group).…”
Section: Moving Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies based on different types of periodicity of data have also been considered in the literature. For instance, the following works were based on daily temperature data: Poppick, McInerney, Moyer, and Stein () studied changes in the distribution of daily temperatures in an ensemble of general circulation model runs predicting changes in both means and variability, and Trewin () developed a new homogenized daily maximum and minimum temperature data set for Australia, among others (Fischer, ; Kleiber, Katz, & Rajagopalan, ; Ngo & Horton, ; Trigo & Palutikof, ; Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies based on different types of periodicity of data have also been considered in the literature. For instance, the following works were based on daily temperature data: Poppick, McInerney, Moyer, and Stein (2016)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%