2014
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927614002475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Decoherence in Fluctuation Electron Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations can be brought into better agreement with experiments bymultiplying 6 -+. 7 by 1/3, which is a typical correction for the "Stobbs factor" between electron microscopy simulations and experiments 12,13,16 . 1:(7) calculations are independent, so they are evenly distributed over the number of available cores.…”
Section: Femsimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations can be brought into better agreement with experiments bymultiplying 6 -+. 7 by 1/3, which is a typical correction for the "Stobbs factor" between electron microscopy simulations and experiments 12,13,16 . 1:(7) calculations are independent, so they are evenly distributed over the number of available cores.…”
Section: Femsimmentioning
confidence: 99%