2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2896615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Challenging Electromagnetic Problems Using a Massively Parallel Finite Element Method Solver

Abstract: This communication presents an efficient massively parallel finite element method solver for the solution of complex and electrically large electromagnetic problems with arbitrary structures. The solver makes use of a domain decomposition algorithm to decompose the original problem into several non-overlapping sub-domains that may be solved independently in parallel through the application of the corresponding transmission conditions on the interfaces of the adjacent sub-domains. A numerical exact mesh truncat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EM simulations of our “room” would require meshes with size to guarantee stability and accuracy of the solutions (including near field effects close to the antennas) 9 . Even for the relatively small-sized room used for our experiment , the attacker would need to solve, within a few seconds, a problem involving trillion of unknowns, which is three orders of magnitude larger than current state-of-the-art large-scale EM simulations run on supercomputers 10 , 11 . While mesh optimization and domain decomposition techniques could be used to speed up calculations, they would be inherently limited by the complexity of the problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM simulations of our “room” would require meshes with size to guarantee stability and accuracy of the solutions (including near field effects close to the antennas) 9 . Even for the relatively small-sized room used for our experiment , the attacker would need to solve, within a few seconds, a problem involving trillion of unknowns, which is three orders of magnitude larger than current state-of-the-art large-scale EM simulations run on supercomputers 10 , 11 . While mesh optimization and domain decomposition techniques could be used to speed up calculations, they would be inherently limited by the complexity of the problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D-TWA can be accelerated by applying the anisotropic mesh technique [39] which calls the 2D-NUFFT to manage precisely the non-uniform discretization. Memory and computational complexity for both the Forward and Backward of the ATWA process is guaranteed at O(B CD;B ) time, where B represents the meshing density applied to the structure to be analyzed, whereas the overall computational complexity of iterative solvers is O(B * ), the same with MOMand FEM-based solvers [40]. Table I recapitulates the iterative process of the ATWA approach, highlighting at each step the computational effort and the total time efficiency.…”
Section: Atwa: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garcia-Castillo are with the Department of Signal Theory and Communications, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28911, Leganes, Spain (e-mail: aamor@ing.uc3m.es, legcasti@ing.uc3m.es) O. Floch, L.L. Toth, and R. Dyczij-Edlinger are with the Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Elektrotechnik, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. All these references can be divided into three groups: i) optimized Schwarz methods, focused on the optimization of the so-called transmission conditions, [16], [25], [30]; ii) cement element methods, which use transmission conditions through the definition of cement variables with physical meaning, [13], [14], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]; iii) finite element tear and interconnecting (FETI) methods, which use Lagrange multipliers to obtain a reduced system of equations, [15], [23], [26], [27], [24], [32],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%