2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Models for Spark Ignition Engine: A Comparative Performance Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFD analysis of engine combustion chamber and Simulink analysis using single-zone zero-dimensional model was done by Chaudhari et.al. The results of simulations were validated with experimental results and found in good agreement with the simulations [20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…CFD analysis of engine combustion chamber and Simulink analysis using single-zone zero-dimensional model was done by Chaudhari et.al. The results of simulations were validated with experimental results and found in good agreement with the simulations [20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This differences is expected as port flow closely resembled the flow bench in term of setup and boundary condition where engine is hold static at each critical point [3,5,12]. Meanwhile, cold flow simulation deals with the tremendous change of parameters during transition from one critical point to another, thus causing more losses in induced flow for moving simulation [5,6]. Even though the deviation is big, the tabulated trend shows that cold flow simulation can be used to investigate the trend and predict the lower limit for the flow coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventhough the large deviation causes the difficulties to accurately predict the real breathing parameter value, the similarities in trend shows that cold flow can be used to predict the trend of discharge coefficient and the lower limit of this breathing parameter. As discharge coefficient is closely related to flow coefficient and only differs in term of referred valve area, it is also deduced that the differences of data obtained is because there is more losses in the valve movement from lower valve lift to high valve lift in cold flow moving simulation [5,6] compared to port flow engine simulation where losses in volume flow rate is measured at static critical point [3,5,12]. In a similar manner to flow coefficient data, repeated simulation shows that discharge coefficient is more precise at 1-4mm valve lift, thus cold flow simulation is suitable for the prediction of trend and lower limit at lower valve lift value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations