Abstract. Analysis of intake breathing capacity is important in order to determine the performance output for any respective engine. Flow coefficient and discharge coefficient are the common parameters used to define the breathing capability and different analysis have been applied by researchers to determine these parameters which include experiments and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analyses. This study aims to investigate the difference in breathing parameters obtained from steady flow simulation and dynamics simulation. Proton CAMPRO 1.6-litre engine was selected as the reference engine in this study. The experiment involved was the flow bench test, while CFD simulation carried out were the port flow analysis (steady flow) and the cold flow analysis (dynamics). Results obtained indicate that flow coefficient and discharge coefficient from cold flow simulation are always lower than both parameter values obtained from port flow simulation and experiment with large deviations of minimum 15.6% and maximum 27%. Meanwhile, the breathing parameter values from port flow simulation were very close to the experimental data with the minimum deviation of 1.6%. This study concludes that port flow simulation is very accurate for the analysis of defining intake breathing capacity, meanwhile cold flow simulation can be used to predict the trend and lower limit of these parameters especially at low valve lift.
Constructors of gasoline engines face higher and higher requirements as regards to ecological issues, and increase in engine efficiency at simultaneous decrease in fuel consumption. Satisfying these requirements is possible by the recognition of the phenomena occurred inside engine cylinder, the choice of suitable optimal parameters of fuel injection process, and the determination of geometrical shapes of the combustion chamber and piston head. The aim of this study is to simulate flow in Fuel Direct-Injection engine with different geometrical shapes of piston head. Designing piston head shapes was done by referring to existing motorcycle, Demak 200cc-single cylinder using SolidWork and ANSYS software. The parameter investigated are shallow and deep bowl design of piston head. In term of fuel distribution throughout the combustion chamber, engine model that has deeper bowl (Model 2) shows better fuel distribution than model of shallow bowl as it manages to direct the fuel injected towards the location of spark plug. Total kinetic energy of Model 2 is about 20% higher than Model 1. Therefore, engine with deeper bowl is chose as the best model between the two models as it can create a richer mixture around the spark plug
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.