Simulation-based comparison of two approaches frequently used for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Abstract

The purpose was to compare two approaches for the acquisition and analysis of dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI data with respect to differences in the modelling of the arterial input-function (AIF), the dependency of the model parameters on physiological parameters and their numerical stability. Eight hundred tissue concentration curves were simulated for different combinations of perfusion, permeability, interstitial volume and plasma volume based on two measured AIFs and analysed according to the two commonly used approaches. The transfer constants (Approach 1) K (trans) and (Approach 2) k (ep) were correlated with all tissue parameters. K (trans) showed a stronger dependency on perfusion, and k (ep) on permeability. The volume parameters (Approach 1) v (e) and (Approach 2) A were mainly influenced by the interstitial and plasma volume. Both approaches allow only rough characterisation of tissue microcirculation and microvasculature. Approach 2 seems to be somewhat more robust than 1, mainly due to the different methods of CA administration.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Antiangiogenic Treatment Effects in Multiple Myeloma

“…These changes were also associated with shorter PFS but did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.85-2.18; P ¼ 0. 19). No significant results were obtained for amplitude A.…”

“…MRI was performed on a 1.5 Tesla MRI (Magnetom Symphony, Siemens Medical Solution) equipped with a spine coil for radiofrequency excitation and detection as described previously (6 (19). Pixel-based analysis of both parameters was performed in manually selected regions of interest (ROI).…”

“…Overall, 21 vertebral bodies had to be excluded from the analysis because of these changes. The Brix model was applied because it had been shown to be more robust than the also established model proposed by Tofts and colleagues (19).…”

Fundamentals of tracer kinetics for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI

“…Also, n e exhibits a strong positive dependence on both blood volume and interstitial volume, and a marginal positive dependence on permeability and flow (57). Considering that K trans and n e are concurrently strongly associated with multiple aspects of the vasculature, one might have difficulty interpreting the mechanism of action of the antiangiogenic drug.…”

Response monitoring of breast cancer patientsreceiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy using breast MRI – a review of current knowledge

“…The parameters could also be influenced by the dose and type of the contrast agent used, and by the method by which the contrast agent is administered. Finally, the MR sequence composition can be of influence on these parameters as well [6,7]. As a result, many variables can be introduced in pharmacokinetic modeling, which make it difficult to compare different studies.…”