ObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating residual disease extent and the ability to detect pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer.MethodsPubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies published until 1 July 2012. After primary selection, two reviewers independently assessed the content of each eligible study using a standardised extraction form and pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.ResultsA total of 35 eligible studies were selected. Correlation coefficients of residual tumour size assessed by MRI and pathology were good, with a median value of 0.698. Reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for predicting pCR with MRI ranged from 25 to 100 %, 50–97 %, 47–73 % and 71–100 %, respectively. Both overestimation and underestimation were observed. MRI proved more accurate in determining residual disease than physical examination, mammography and ultrasound. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be influenced by treatment regimen and breast cancer subtype.ConclusionsBreast MRI accuracy for assessing residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is good and surpasses other diagnostic means. However, both overestimation and underestimation of residual disease extent could be observed.Main Messages• Breast MRI accuracy for assessing residual disease is good and surpasses other diagnostic means.• Correlation coefficients of residual tumour size assessed by MRI and pathology were considered good.• However, both overestimation and underestimation of residual disease were observed.• Diagnostic accuracy of MRI seems to be affected by treatment regimen and breast cancer subtype.

ObjectivesContrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a promising problem-solving tool in women referred from a breast cancer screening program. We aimed to study the validity of preliminary results of CESM using a larger panel of radiologists with different levels of CESM experience.MethodsAll women referred from the Dutch breast cancer screening program were eligible for CESM. 199 consecutive cases were viewed by ten radiologists. Four had extensive CESM experience, three had no CESM experience but were experienced breast radiologists, and three were residents. All readers provided a BI-RADS score for the low-energy CESM images first, after which the score could be adjusted when viewing the entire CESM exam. BI-RADS 1-3 were considered benign and BI-RADS 4-5 malignant. With this cutoff, we calculated sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve.ResultsCESM increased diagnostic accuracy in all readers. The performance for all readers using CESM was: sensitivity 96.9 % (+3.9 %), specificity 69.7 % (+33.8 %) and area under the ROC curve 0.833 (+0.188).ConclusionCESM is superior to conventional mammography, with excellent problem-solving capabilities in women referred from the breast cancer screening program. Previous results were confirmed even in a larger panel of readers with varying CESM experience.Key Points• CESM is consistently superior to conventional mammography • CESM increases diagnostic accuracy regardless of a reader’s experience • CESM is an excellent problem-solving tool in recalls from screening programs

Few well-validated pre-treatment MR parameters exist that identify responders and non-responders. Eligible studies showed heterogeneous study designs which hampered pooling of data. Confounders and technical variations of MRI accuracy are not studied adequately. Value of MRI for response evaluation needs to be established further.

Background: Breast MRI is the most accurate method for evaluating treatment response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Germline pathogenic alterations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 (BRCA1) and 2 (BRCA2) are the most prevalent causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The increasing trend in proportion of cancer patients undergoing genetic testing, followed by predictive testing in families of new index patients, results in a significant increase of healthy germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who are at increased risk for breast, ovarian, and other BRCA-related cancers. This review aims to give an overview of available screening guidelines for female and male carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 variants per cancer type, incorporating malignancies that are more or less recently well correlated with BRCA1/2. We selected guidelines from national/international organizations and/or professional associations that were published or updated between January 1, 2015, and February 1, 2020. In total, 12 guidelines were included. This review reveals several significant discordances between the different guidelines. Optimal surveillance strategies depend on accurate age-specific cancer risk estimates, which are not reliably available for all BRCA-related cancers. Up-to-date national or international consensus guidelines are of utmost importance to harmonize counseling and proposed surveillance strategies for BRCA1/2 carriers.

No abstract

Background: The introduction of multi-gene panel testing and improved awareness under patients and physicians has led to an increase of individuals with known germline pathogenic variants in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) genes. Significant regional differences exist in germline mutational landscape. We aimed to report the findings from multi-gene panel testing in a large Belgian cohort of individuals at risk for HBOC. Methods: All individuals who underwent multi-gene panel testing for HBOC at the Center for Human Genetics of the University Hospitals Leuven since the introduction of the panel were included (March 2016-April 2019). All included individuals were considered candidates for HBOC-panel testing by the requesting physician based on a personal or familial history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Testing criteria from the Belgian Society of Human Genetics (www.beshg.be/download/guidelines/Guidelines_HBOC_2018.pdf) were met in the vast majority. The panel used was the BRCA Hereditary Cancer MASTR Plus® (Agilent, Belgium), with sequencing of BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53, MRE11A, RAD50, NBN, FAM175A, ATM, PALB2, STK11, MEN1, PTEN, CDH1, MUTYH, CHEK2, BLM, XRCC2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2 and MSH2. Sequencing was performed by NGS on a Miseq platform (Illumina). Genomic deletions and duplications in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were investigated with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. We hereby report on the frequency of pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline variants in this population. Results: In 5422 individuals who underwent multi-gene panel testing, we detected 665 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 639 patients (11,7%). In 25 patients (0.46%), more than one relevant alteration was detected with double heterozygosity in 24 individuals and triple heterozygosity in one. Germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were detected in 178 (3.3%) and 144 (2.7%) patients, resulting in a fraction of 26,4% and 21,4% of detected variants respectively. Relevant alterations in CHEK2, ATM, PALB2 and TP53 were observed in 135 (2.5%), 93 (1.7%), 26 (0.5%) and 11 (0.2%) patients respectively, accounting together for 39.3% of detected variants. Alterations in BRIP1/RAD51C/RAD51D were retrieved in 64 patients (1.2%) and alterations in mismatch-repair genes MSH6/MLH1/PMS2/MSH2 were detected in 0.3% of patients. These patients where dominantly referred for familial history of ovarian cancer. Furthermore, germline alterations in PTEN, CDH1 and BLM were observed in 3, 2 and 1 cases respectively. Double heterozygosity for ATM+CHEK2 and for ATM+BRCA2 were both observed in 3 cases. In the patient with triple heterozygosity, co-occurrence of pathogenic variants in BRCA2, ATM and CHEK2 was detected. Conclusions: In a large Belgian cohort of 5422 individuals at risk for HBOC who underwent multi-gene panel testing, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant was detected in 11,7% of patients, and in 0,46% of patients double or triple heterozygosity for HBOC-variants was observed. Almost 40% of detected variants were alterations beyond BRCA correlated with hereditary breast cancer (CHEK2, ATM, PALB2 and TP53). Given the time-lag to predictive testing in families, a significant rise in healthy carriers with these non-BRCA alterations is expected in the upcoming years. Citation Format: Kevin Punie, Griet Hoste, Griet Van Buggenhout, Ellen Denayer, Hilde Brems, Hilde Peeters, Ann Smeets, Ines Nevelsteen, Patrick Neven, Jan Ardui, Renate Prevos, Machteld Keupers, Chantal Van Ongeval, Giuseppe Floris, Christine Desmedt, Hans Wildiers, Geneviève Michils, Hilde Van Esch, Eric Legius. Germline mutational landscape in 5422 individuals at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who underwent multi-gene panel testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-03.

No abstract