2019
DOI: 10.3390/electronics8121553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and Result Analysis of Split Gate Resurf Stepped Oxide UMOFSET with Floating Electrode for Improved Performance

Abstract: In this study, a split-gate resurf stepped oxide with a floating electrode (FSGRSO) UMOSFET has been proposed. The source in the trench is divided into two electrodes, namely: the upper electrode and the lower electrode. The upper one is the floating electrode, which redistributes the electric potential vertically, and improves the breakdown voltage and figure of merit (FOM). The breakdown (BV) and FOM of the FSGRSO UMOSFET have been improved up to 27.3% and 62.7%, respectively, compared with the SGRSO UMOSFET… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the counterpart of CSGT-MOS is located at the bottom trench. The peak electric field in the middle of the drift region is helpful to redistribute the electric field [12][13][14][15], and thus a more uniform electric field is formed in the HKP SGT-MOS and SSGT-MOS. It is clear that the electric field of HKP SGT-MOS decreases much more slowly than that of the SSGT-OS from the position of peak electric field to the N + substrate due to the reshape effect of the high-k pillar.…”
Section: Structure and Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the counterpart of CSGT-MOS is located at the bottom trench. The peak electric field in the middle of the drift region is helpful to redistribute the electric field [12][13][14][15], and thus a more uniform electric field is formed in the HKP SGT-MOS and SSGT-MOS. It is clear that the electric field of HKP SGT-MOS decreases much more slowly than that of the SSGT-OS from the position of peak electric field to the N + substrate due to the reshape effect of the high-k pillar.…”
Section: Structure and Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the optimal FOM of 31.7 MW cm −2 for the proposed method is obtained at W m = 2.8 µm, which is improved by 81% and 40% compared to the CSGT-MOS and SSGT-MOS, respectively. Moreover, benefiting from the reshape effect of high-k pillar, the HKP SGT-MOS achieves its optimal FOM with a smaller mesa width compared with the CSGT-MOS, as shown in figure 10, which can reduce all of the cell pitch, the specific resistance and power losses [14].…”
Section: Influence Of the Mesa Width (Wm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations