AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-0571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and Modeling of Cold-Wall Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers on Flat Plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change of sign in v T generates a singularity in the turbulent Prandtl number at the wall-normal location where the peak mean temperature is attained. The value of the turbulent Prandtl number becomes close to 0.50 below the wall-normal location of the singularity, as also observed in recent simulations of hypersonic boundary layers at much lower stagnation enthalpies (Huang et al 2020).…”
Section: Temperature and Density Statisticssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The change of sign in v T generates a singularity in the turbulent Prandtl number at the wall-normal location where the peak mean temperature is attained. The value of the turbulent Prandtl number becomes close to 0.50 below the wall-normal location of the singularity, as also observed in recent simulations of hypersonic boundary layers at much lower stagnation enthalpies (Huang et al 2020).…”
Section: Temperature and Density Statisticssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, the domain of application for this assumption has been extended to the hypersonic Mach number regime recently by Duan et al (29). Another recent study by Huang et al (30) suggests that density fluctuations become more significant in high Mach number conditions citing the differences between Reynolds averaged and Favre averaged turbulent shear stress.…”
Section: Density Fluctuation In Compressible Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 4) still shows some disagreements from the ideal universal profiles, as reported in Refs. [27,30,31]. Huang et al [30] performed cooled-wall hypersonic Ma ∞ = 11, 14 turbulent boundary layer simulations and reported an upwards shift of the transformed velocity profiles in the inertial sublayer, compared with that of quasi-adiabatic-wall supersonic boundary layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27,30,31]. Huang et al [30] performed cooled-wall hypersonic Ma ∞ = 11, 14 turbulent boundary layer simulations and reported an upwards shift of the transformed velocity profiles in the inertial sublayer, compared with that of quasi-adiabatic-wall supersonic boundary layers. Volpiani et al [31] also reported the upwards shift in the inertial sublayer of heated-wall hypersonic Ma ∞ = 5 turbulent boundary layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%