2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.1144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic transitional boundary layer at suborbital enthalpies

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(134 reference statements)
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 15( a ) (displayed in external units for better clarity) shows that the estimation fails at the peak of , located at , since the coexistence of null temperature gradient and turbulent heat flux causes an overshoot. Such a behaviour was previously observed by Duan & Martín (2011 b ) and Di Renzo & Urzay (2021) (for a discussion about the validity of this assumption for adiabatic hypersonic boundary layers, see Passiatore et al. 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 15( a ) (displayed in external units for better clarity) shows that the estimation fails at the peak of , located at , since the coexistence of null temperature gradient and turbulent heat flux causes an overshoot. Such a behaviour was previously observed by Duan & Martín (2011 b ) and Di Renzo & Urzay (2021) (for a discussion about the validity of this assumption for adiabatic hypersonic boundary layers, see Passiatore et al. 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In figure 11( a ), a peak emerges on each side of the location (), as classically observed for wall-cooled TBLs (Duan, Beekman & Martín 2010; Zhang et al. 2018; Di Renzo & Urzay 2021). The predominance of the outer r.m.s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations