2020 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2020 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Syst 2020
DOI: 10.1109/eeeic/icpseurope49358.2020.9160851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation Analysis of PI and Fuzzy Controller for Dynamic Wireless Charging of Electric Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the frequency is fixed, the control must be made with a large margin to guarantee zero voltage switching, provided that there is a big difference. The DC-DC converter of [52] was the DWPT operated by both PI and fuzzy controllers compared their respective performances.…”
Section: Phase-locked Loop Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the frequency is fixed, the control must be made with a large margin to guarantee zero voltage switching, provided that there is a big difference. The DC-DC converter of [52] was the DWPT operated by both PI and fuzzy controllers compared their respective performances.…”
Section: Phase-locked Loop Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DC-DC buck-boost converter of the DWPT controlled by PI and Fuzzy controllers, and their performances compared in [222]. PI controller has longer settling time, even though, it produces ripple-free output voltage, current, and power signals.…”
Section: Power(w)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference 105, PI and Fuzzy controllers were used to compare the performance of a DWPT DC‐DC and buck‐boost converter. Despite providing fluctuating voltage output, current, and power indications, the PI controller has a greater transient response.…”
Section: Controlling Techniques Of Wpt Systems Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%