2020
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.4950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation acceptance scale (SAS): A validity and reliability study

Abstract: A review of literature reveals serious problems in the validity and reliability of the measurement tools used in simulation technology acceptance studies conducted in the context of various technology acceptance models. To address this gap in literature, this study proposes a measurement tool that will allow a valid and reliable measurement of students’ acceptance levels. The study was conducted in the 2017–2018 academic year and involved a group of 409 health sciences students. Exploratory factor analysis (EF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normal value of glycosylated hemoglobin is 4%∼6%. Assessed the anxiety and depression of the two groups with the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) [ 7 ] and self-rating depression (SDS) before and after nursing [ 8 ]. Assessed the quality of life of the two groups with short-form health survey 36 (SF-36), after follow-up, consisting of eight aspects like physical function (PF), general health (GH), vitality (VT), mental health (MH), social function (SF), role-physical function (RP), bodily pain (BP), and role-emotional function (RE), with a total of 36 items [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The normal value of glycosylated hemoglobin is 4%∼6%. Assessed the anxiety and depression of the two groups with the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) [ 7 ] and self-rating depression (SDS) before and after nursing [ 8 ]. Assessed the quality of life of the two groups with short-form health survey 36 (SF-36), after follow-up, consisting of eight aspects like physical function (PF), general health (GH), vitality (VT), mental health (MH), social function (SF), role-physical function (RP), bodily pain (BP), and role-emotional function (RE), with a total of 36 items [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessed the anxiety and depression of the two groups with the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) [ 7 ] and self-rating depression (SDS) before and after nursing [ 8 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on EFA results, information can be accurately extracted from the scale data. Therefore, the CFA for scale psychometric evaluation was deemed appropriate [74]. Seven components were extracted (Table 3) and explained of the variance.…”
Section: Sample Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research aimed at self-assessment among Iranian EFL university students shows that while self-assessment is highly reliable (Manzari, 2023). Research on the Simulation Acceptance Scale (SAS) that was developed can be used because it is reliable (Sezer et al, 2020). Research to provide evidence of the validity and reliability of student assessments of teaching quality using assessments from TIMSS 2019 (Senden et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%