2015
DOI: 10.7848/ksgpc.2015.33.3.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the Impacts of the Greenbelt Policy Reform on Sustainable Urban Growth: The Case of Busan Metropolitan Area

Abstract: The greenbelt of South Korea has been under the process of adjustment and removal since its first designated year. This research is aimed at predicting the effect that the removal of the greenbelt has on urban growth. The SLEUTH model was executed via three calibration phases using historical data between 1990 and 2010. The urban growth of Busan Metropolitan City was predicted under its historical trend, as well as two different scenarios including development and compact development up to the year 2030. The a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous researches, the setting of the exclusion layer was relatively simplified as they usually assigned a few different exclusion probabilities. Examples include the simulation of Busan in South Korea where the exclusion probabilities for the three levels were 100% for a greenbelt and 75%, and 0% for two levels of legal conservation areas, respectively [48], and a study of Shanghai in China where the exclusion probability was divided into three levels, 100% for water areas and wetlands, 80% for farmlands, and 60% for grassland [65]. By dividing the MCR-based land suitability assessment map into 20 grades in our study, the exclusion probability was however continuously changed, from 0% to 100%, and the exclusion layer that we generated for Scenario 3 would better characterize the suitability of land for urbanization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous researches, the setting of the exclusion layer was relatively simplified as they usually assigned a few different exclusion probabilities. Examples include the simulation of Busan in South Korea where the exclusion probabilities for the three levels were 100% for a greenbelt and 75%, and 0% for two levels of legal conservation areas, respectively [48], and a study of Shanghai in China where the exclusion probability was divided into three levels, 100% for water areas and wetlands, 80% for farmlands, and 60% for grassland [65]. By dividing the MCR-based land suitability assessment map into 20 grades in our study, the exclusion probability was however continuously changed, from 0% to 100%, and the exclusion layer that we generated for Scenario 3 would better characterize the suitability of land for urbanization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most straightforward practice is setting the exclusion probability for all areas at 0, though sometimes except for major water bodies [13,29,47]. Another approach is assigning different exclusion probabilities to land use type according to urban planning [13,25,48]. Among them, high exclusion probability can be set for nature reserves, forest areas and waters to reflect the protection of ecological land.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenbelts in South Korea can be considered one of the successful environmental-friendly regulations in Asian countries [25], due to effective preservation of nature surrounding the cities, as well as restraining extensive development. However, Korean greenbelt policies have been deregulated in recent years in response to urban expansion demand for sustainable new town development.…”
Section: Background Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urbanization rate of Korea increased from 39.1% to 90.5% for a period of 1960-2008, with the rapid nationwide population increase from 25 million to 48.9 million during the same period [34]. The current population of Korea is estimated at 51,529,338 in 2015 (see Table 1), and 49.7% (25,140,000) of the population lives in Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi-do. In recent years, metropolitan type of expansion has accomplished especially in Seoul and its vicinity.…”
Section: Current Situation Of the Korean Greenbelt Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prior study assumed that compact development would lead to the full elimination of the greenbelt zone and more compact future urban growth [23]. Under this assumption, we analyzed future urban growth to overcome land shortages due to urban development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%