2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating past severe flood events to evaluate the effectiveness of nonstructural flood countermeasures in the upper Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the KST dam was considered as a hypothetical one and Simultaneously, analysis of historical hydrological data has shown that the downstream flood risk increases drastically when the discharge at C.2 station is more than 3590 m 3 /s, resulting in huge economic losses in the lower CPRB (Jamrussri & Toda, 2017). Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of the KST dam in reducing the peak discharge below this threshold values at Y.6 and C.2 stations.…”
Section: Hypothetical Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the KST dam was considered as a hypothetical one and Simultaneously, analysis of historical hydrological data has shown that the downstream flood risk increases drastically when the discharge at C.2 station is more than 3590 m 3 /s, resulting in huge economic losses in the lower CPRB (Jamrussri & Toda, 2017). Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of the KST dam in reducing the peak discharge below this threshold values at Y.6 and C.2 stations.…”
Section: Hypothetical Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of variance indicated that reforestation resulted in a significant reduction in runoff and sediment transport. Another study in the Chao Phraya River Basin and based on numerical models [83] showed that specific non-structural measures (reforestation, wetlands, and the combination of both) had considerable potential to reduce peak discharges and flood volumes. Indeed, it was suggested that integration of these proposed non-structural flood countermeasures with the existing countermeasures in the Chao Phraya River Basin would be the most practical way to cope with the challenges of future flood disasters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the absence of some form of compensation, farmers located in irrigated schemes may eventually oppose the use of their land for flood retention. Third, simulations run by Jamrussri and Toda () showed the limited impacts of the Yom‐Nan flood retention project on the flood patterns under the hypothesis that the project would enable the storage of one billion cubic metres of water. Thus, implementing flood retention areas only inside irrigation schemes located in the downstream part of the Yom and Nan River Basins (involving a planned stored volume of 723 million cubic metres) could have limited impacts on the global patterns of flood expansion in the Chao Phraya River Basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%