2011
DOI: 10.2172/1012239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating a Nationally Representative Housing Sample Using EnergyPlus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each IDF file was then edited to correctly size heating and cooling equipment for each vintage and location based on knowledge of commonly available incremental air-conditioner and furnace capacities (i.e., in increments of 1.75 or 3.5 kW) and typical manufacturer-recommended airflow rates. This typically involved correctly sizing heating and cooling systems relative to the load in existing and new vintages and under-sizing heating and cooling systems in older vintage homes, which served to reflect more realistic operation than what was originally assumed in BEopt (Hopkins et al 2011). Any deficits in capacity were assumed to either lead to thermal discomfort or be supplemented by window airconditioning units or space heaters (without additional filtration), as would be somewhat common for older homes.…”
Section: Initial Beopt and Energyplus Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each IDF file was then edited to correctly size heating and cooling equipment for each vintage and location based on knowledge of commonly available incremental air-conditioner and furnace capacities (i.e., in increments of 1.75 or 3.5 kW) and typical manufacturer-recommended airflow rates. This typically involved correctly sizing heating and cooling systems relative to the load in existing and new vintages and under-sizing heating and cooling systems in older vintage homes, which served to reflect more realistic operation than what was originally assumed in BEopt (Hopkins et al 2011). Any deficits in capacity were assumed to either lead to thermal discomfort or be supplemented by window airconditioning units or space heaters (without additional filtration), as would be somewhat common for older homes.…”
Section: Initial Beopt and Energyplus Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of methods to simulate building energy demand is provided by Swan and Ugursal (2009) and Kavgic et al (2010). Bottom-up analyses use building simulation tools that include the hourly heating and cooling requirements for individual buildings using historical weather data (Hopkins et al 2011;Polly et al 2011;Hendron and Engebrecht 2010). These studies often aggregate a large number of buildings and have the ability to provide estimates of cooling demand over large regions.…”
Section: Traditional Methods For Estimating Hourly Cooling Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes many innovative simulation capabilities, including, but not limited to, time-steps less than an hour, modular systems and plants with integrated heat balance-based zone simulation, multi-zone air flow, thermal comfort, water use, natural ventilation, and renewable energy systems. EnergyPlus has been widely used by a lot of researchers [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Each version of EnergyPlus is tested extensively before release [37].…”
Section: Energyplus Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%