1991
DOI: 10.1159/000276198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated Long-Term Driving Performance before and after Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

Abstract: To investigate whether automobile drivers with the clinical features of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) perform worse than controls in a simulated long-term test drive, and to see if their driving improves after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), 15 male drivers with SAS, suffering from sleep spells whilst driving, and 10 matched controls without a history of SAS or hypersomnia at the wheel were tested in an advanced driving simulator. Brake reaction time, lateral position deviation and off-road episodes were measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1
6

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
12
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity of the driving simulation tests varies widely but the results are quite consistent in their outcome: driving simulated performance is worse in sleepy patients, regardless the cause of sleepiness, and when sleep apnoea patients are treated (either with n-CPAP or uvulopalatopharyngoplasty) -not surprisingly -their performances on driving simulator tasks improve according to current accident rates Findley et al, 1989Findley et al, , 1995Findley et al, , 1999George, 2003;George et al, 1996aGeorge et al, ,b, 1997George, 2004;Hack et al, 2000Hack et al, , 2001Haraldsson et al, 1991Haraldsson et al, , 1995aJuniper et al, 2000;Lloberes et al, 2000;Munoz et al, 2000;Orth et al, 2005;Pizza et al, 2004;Risser et al, 2000;Sagaspe et al, 2007;Turkington et al, 2001Turkington et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The complexity of the driving simulation tests varies widely but the results are quite consistent in their outcome: driving simulated performance is worse in sleepy patients, regardless the cause of sleepiness, and when sleep apnoea patients are treated (either with n-CPAP or uvulopalatopharyngoplasty) -not surprisingly -their performances on driving simulator tasks improve according to current accident rates Findley et al, 1989Findley et al, , 1995Findley et al, , 1999George, 2003;George et al, 1996aGeorge et al, ,b, 1997George, 2004;Hack et al, 2000Hack et al, , 2001Haraldsson et al, 1991Haraldsson et al, , 1995aJuniper et al, 2000;Lloberes et al, 2000;Munoz et al, 2000;Orth et al, 2005;Pizza et al, 2004;Risser et al, 2000;Sagaspe et al, 2007;Turkington et al, 2001Turkington et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…UPPP is the only operation in OSA for which a decrease of driving-accident risk [27,28] and a normalisation of raised CRP-measures in serum [29] could be shown.…”
Section: Upppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the risk of accidents varies from series to series. Nonetheless, simulated driving performance improves with successful treatment of OSA with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)10 11 or uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP)12 13 and there are several subjective reports of reduced collisions once patients are treated 14-1718…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%