Objectives: To examine whether medical history and nasopharyngeal examination are useful for predicting obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and to compare these findings with those of the gold standard, polysomnography. Design: Patients underwent polysomnography recordings for 2 nights and an otorhinolaryngologic examination, including flexible endoscopy and the Müller maneuver. Nasal and pharyngeal findings were scored in a semiquantitative way. The medical history of each patient was taken using a standardized questionnaire. Anatomic and functional findings and patient history were correlated with the mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Setting: An otorhinolaryngologic clinic. Patients: A total of 101 patients presenting with a primary complaint of snoring. Main Outcome Measures: Differences between patients with OSAS and primary snorers were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test (anatomic findings), t test (Müller maneuver), and 2 test after Pearson correlation (questionnaire). P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. METHODS We evaluated 101 patients who presented to an ENT clinic with a chief complaint of snor

To date, a satisfactory definition of snoring is lacking. Snoring is caused by a vibration of soft tissue in the upper airway induced by respiration during sleep. It is triggered by relaxation of the upper airway dilator muscles that occurs during sleep. Multiple risk factors for snoring have been described and snoring is of multifactorial origin. The true incidence of snoring is not clear to date, as the incidence differs throughout literature. Snoring is more likely to appear in middle age, predominantly in males. Diagnostic measures should include a sleep medical history, preferably involving an interview with the bed partner, and may be completed with questionnaires. Clinical examination should include examination of the nose to evaluate the relevant structures for nasal breathing and may be completed with nasal endoscopy. Evaluation of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx should also be performed. Clinical assessment of the oral cavity should include the size of the tongue, the mucosa of the oral cavity, and the dental status. Furthermore, facial skeletal morphology should be evaluated. In select cases, technical diagnostic measures may be added. Further objective measures should be performed if the medical history and/or clinical examination suggest sleep-disordered breathing, if relevant comorbidities are present, and if the subject requests treatment for snoring. According to current knowledge, snoring is not associated with medical hazard, and generally, there is no medical indication for treatment. Weight reduction should be achieved in every overweight subject who snores. In snorers who snore only in the supine position, positional treatment can be considered. In suitable cases, snoring can be treated successfully with intraoral devices. Minimally invasive surgery of the soft palate can be considered as long as the individual anatomy appears suitable. Treatment selection should be based on individual anatomic findings. After a therapeutic intervention, follow-up visits should take place after an appropriate time frame to assess treatment success and to potentially indicate further intervention.

No abstract

Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) can be quantified concerning their amplitude and frequency. They are known to be diminished or absent in sensorineural hearing loss. It is therefore of interest how TEOAE and DPOAE correlate with the auditory threshold and whether the auditory threshold can be predicted by these variables. In a cross sectional study of 61 patients (102 ears) with sensorineural hearing loss, auditory threshold, tympanometry, stapedius reflexes, TEOAE and DPOAE were measured. Correlation coefficients of the hearing loss (0.5-6 kHz) and the amplitude of the distortion product 2f1-f2 (0.46 4 kHz) respectively TEOAE amplitude (1-4 kHz) were computed. TEOAE showed lower correlation coefficients and less frequency specificity than DPOAE. In order to increase the correlations with the auditory threshold we fitted a multivariate linear regression model with TEOAE and DPOAE simultaneously as predictors for the auditory threshold gaining 95% prediction intervals of 19-39 dB depending on the frequency investigated. By restricting the hearing loss to a maximum of 70 dB HL the 95% prediction interval of the auditory threshold could be decreased to 18-26 dB. Further improvements can be expected if the high inter- and intraindividual variability of TEOAE and particularly DPOAE measurements can be reduced. The results allow us to use TEOAE and DPOAE in addition to click-evoked brainstem audiometry in order to provide more frequency specific information about the hearing loss in newborns, which is of the utmost importance for an ideal fitting of hearing aids.

The current guideline discusses conservative and surgical therapy of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults from the perspective of the ear, nose and throat specialist. The revised guideline was commissioned by the German Society of Ear-Nose-Throat, Head-Neck Surgery (DG HNO KHC) and compiled by the DG HNO KHC's Working Group on Sleep Medicine. The guideline was based on a formal consensus procedure according to the guidelines set out by the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in the form of a"S2e guideline". Research of the literature available on the subject up to and including December 2008 forms the basis for the recommendations. Evaluation of the publications found was made according to the recommendations of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). This yielded a recommendation grade, whereby grade A represents highly evidence-based studies and grade D those with a low evidence base.