2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-4115-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated hydrologic response to projected changes in precipitation and temperature in the Congo River basin

Abstract: Abstract. Despite their global significance, the impacts of climate change on water resources and associated ecosystem services in the Congo River basin (CRB) have been understudied. Of particular need for decision makers is the availability of spatial and temporal variability of runoff projections. Here, with the aid of a spatially explicit hydrological model forced with precipitation and temperature projections from 25 global climate models (GCMs) under two greenhouse gas emission scenarios, we explore the v… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to data, and given a critical lack of in-situ data, there have been efforts made towards the use of global datasets, including global climate (both reanalysis and satellite-based) and physical basin properties datasets as well as satellite altimetry for prediction of water level and discharge. With regard to process understanding, a number of functions have been developed to improve existing model structures, most specifically to address the issues of modeling natural storages of wetlands and lakes that dominate the hydrology of the Congo Basin as well as the routing functions of the large river channels [112][113][114][115]. However, there have also been a number of problems that challenged the various modeling exercises.…”
Section: Hydrological Modeling In the Congo River Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to data, and given a critical lack of in-situ data, there have been efforts made towards the use of global datasets, including global climate (both reanalysis and satellite-based) and physical basin properties datasets as well as satellite altimetry for prediction of water level and discharge. With regard to process understanding, a number of functions have been developed to improve existing model structures, most specifically to address the issues of modeling natural storages of wetlands and lakes that dominate the hydrology of the Congo Basin as well as the routing functions of the large river channels [112][113][114][115]. However, there have also been a number of problems that challenged the various modeling exercises.…”
Section: Hydrological Modeling In the Congo River Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, visual inspection through scatter plots revealed good agreement between the observed and the PGF temperature, and thus, the suitability of the PGF temperature data for the analysis of thermal bioclimatic trends in Iran. The PGF data has also been found suitable for trend analysis in a number of studies at global [49,50] and regional [7,32,51,52] scales, including in Asia [7,37,[53][54][55].…”
Section: Princeton Global Meteorological Forcing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while bias correction of atmospheric variables was recognized a necessary step for offline impact and adaptation studies especially via hydrological models (Aloysius & Saiers, 2017;Teutschbein & Seibert, 2012), it is not easy to bias-correct GCM/ESM runoff outputs to be then converted into river discharge. To date, lack of spatially explicit data on overland runoff generation prevents any point-by-point evaluation and bias correction of this variable (Zaitchik et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproduction of the hydrological cycle for large rivers (i.e., approximately those with a drainage area above 100,000 km 2 according to Liebscher, 1993) was recently evaluated starting from the runoff generated by GCMs/ESMs at each grid point and deriving discharge values following unrouted (Alkama et al, 2013;Bring et al, 2015) or routed (Koirala et al, 2014) approaches or through offline forcing of GHMs, DGVMs/LSMs, and mesoscale hydrological models by CMIP5 climate simulations (Aloysius & Saiers, 2017;Bring et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2016). Moreover, to our knowledge, evaluations on how CMIP5 models simulate online the river discharge, at least at the land-sea interface, are still missing (Flato et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%