Simulated comparisons of breeding plans for beef production: Part 3—systems for producing feeder-calves involving intensive culling and additional breeds of sire

Congleton, W.R.; Goodwill, R.E.

doi:10.1016/0308-521x(80)90054-2

Agricultural Systems

1980

DOI: 10.1016/0308-521x(80)90054-2

|View full text |Cite

Simulated comparisons of breeding plans for beef production: Part 3—systems for producing feeder-calves involving intensive culling and additional breeds of sire

W.R. Congleton

R.E. Goodwill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1992

2000

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow-calf segment

1992

Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deterministic computer models were used to simulate the cow-calf segment of an integrated production system. Angus, Charolais, Hereford, Limousin, and Simmental breeds were included in three mating systems: pure-breeding (PB) or two- (2R) or three-breed (3R) rotational crossbreeding. Breed data were taken from the literature. Herds were evaluated over the production year. Sires represented breed averages and were available from sources outside their herds, and 100 replacement heifers were saved annually. Females in 3R had the highest average energy requirements (8,144 Mcal of ME.cow-1.yr-1) and production costs ($322.31.cow-1.yr-1), and PB females had the lowest average requirements (7,748 Mcal of ME.cow-1.yr-1) and costs ($313.2.cow-1.yr-1). Purebred systems were the least biologically and economically efficient (64.9 Mcal of ME/kg of steer equivalent, $2.35/kg of steer equivalent), respectively, and 3R systems were the most efficient (56.6 Mcal of ME/kg of steer equivalent, $1.95/kg of steer equivalent). On average, 3R systems were more efficient biologically and economically than 2R systems. However, some 2R systems were as efficient as some 3R systems. Crossbred combinations containing Angus and(or) Hereford ranked more biologically and economically efficient than other breed combinations. Conversely, British purebreds ranked more biologically efficient, whereas Continental purebreds ranked more economically efficient.

show abstract

Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow-calf segment

1992

Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluation of crossbred calf and cow types for the coastal plain of North Carolina.

Pala

Robison²,

McCraw

2000

Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data in this experiment consisted of 418 lactation records, and weaning and birth weight records from 600 crossbred calves. The traits evaluated included birth weight, weaning weight, weaning weight per cow exposed, weaning weight per weight of cow, weaning weight per weight of cow exposed, and predicted milk yield. Angus, Brangus, and Gelbvieh sires were mated to purebred Hereford cows. Yearling and 2-yr-old Angus-Hereford, Brangus-Hereford, and Gelbvieh-Hereford daughters then were bred to Polled Hereford bulls (Data Set 2). Later-parity Angus-Hereford, Brangus-Hereford, and Gelbvieh-Hereford daughters were mated to Salers or Simmental sires (Data Set 3). Differences between Gelbvieh- and Brangus-sired calves or Gelbvieh-Hereford and Brangus-Hereford daughters were never significant for weaning weight, birth weight, or milk yield. Angus crosses had the lowest weaning weight, birth weight, and milk yield, but the highest kilograms of calf weaned per cow exposed in all data sets. Angus-Hereford and Brangus-Hereford dams had higher weaning weight per weight of cow exposed than Gelbvieh-Hereford dams (P < .01) in Data Set 3. There were no other significant differences related to cow weight.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Simulated comparisons of breeding plans for beef production: Part 3—systems for producing feeder-calves involving intensive culling and additional breeds of sire

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow-calf segment

Evaluation of mating systems involving five breeds for integrated beef production systems: I. Cow-calf segment

Evaluation of crossbred calf and cow types for the coastal plain of North Carolina.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About