2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIMSI-Transfer: Software-Assisted Reduction of Missing Values in Phosphoproteomic and Proteomic Isobaric Labeling Data Using Tandem Mass Spectrum Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution would be the further improvement in instruments and data analysis tools. Very recently, SIMSI-transfer was developed to transfer successful database search hits in one TMT batch to other TMT batches to help rescue imperfect MS2 spectra based on the similarity of MS2 spectra and the accurate mass, by which the proteome coverage in each batch and the overlap percentage among all batches are remarkably increased . Similar algorithms could be developed for TAG-TMTpro approach to increase the proteome coverage and the identification overlap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution would be the further improvement in instruments and data analysis tools. Very recently, SIMSI-transfer was developed to transfer successful database search hits in one TMT batch to other TMT batches to help rescue imperfect MS2 spectra based on the similarity of MS2 spectra and the accurate mass, by which the proteome coverage in each batch and the overlap percentage among all batches are remarkably increased . Similar algorithms could be developed for TAG-TMTpro approach to increase the proteome coverage and the identification overlap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, we used a 50× carrier to obtain good proteome coverage in the RTS-based protein identification and quantification; however, we suggest that the carrier-sample ratio should be further reduced to 10× or lower with the sensitivity improvement of the RTS algorithm. The reduced proteome coverage due to low carrier ratio could be improved using isobaric match between runs (iMBR) algorithm, as demonstrated by recent studies. , In addition to sensitivity and quantification accuracy, other technical improvements such as analysis throughput could be achieved by using higher multiplex isobaric reagents or combined precursor isotopic labeling and isobaric tagging (cPILOT) approaches. , Moreover, because of the inherent differences in ion detection between LIT and OT, it could be highly valuable to perform an additional study on the response linearity and quantification dynamic ranges of both detection methods for single-cell-scale samples. Such study could provide insight on their performance in the absolute quantification of proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced proteome coverage due to low carrier ratio could be improved using isobaric match between runs (iMBR) algorithm, as demonstrated by recent studies. 65,66 In addition to sensitivity and quantification accuracy, other technical improvements such as analysis throughput could be achieved by using higher multiplex isobaric reagents 67 or combined precursor isotopic labeling and isobaric tagging (cPILOT) approaches. 68,69 Moreover, because of the inherent differences in ion detection between LIT and OT, it could be highly valuable to perform an additional study on the response linearity and quantification dynamic ranges of both detection methods for single-cell-scale samples.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labeling method with TMT detected changes in the number of low-abundance proteins available for hypothesis testing, showing higher precision and fewer missing values compared to a label-free quantitation method [ 42 ]. It should be noted that the accurate interpretation of TMT-based quantitative proteomic data requires minimizing false positives, batch effects, and missing values [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Tmt-assisted Single-cell Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%