Simplifying the Complexity in the Problem of Choosing the Best Private-Sector Partner

Abstract

Governments frequently partner with the private sector to provide infrastructure and public services. These cooperations, known as public–private partnerships (PPPs), have often failed. Sometimes, due to the problem’s complexity, the public sector cannot choose the right partner for these projects, which is one of the main reasons for failures. Complexity in such problems is associated with a large number of indicators, imprecise judgments of decision-makers or problem owners, and the unpredictability of the environment (under conditions of uncertainty). Therefore, presenting a simplified algorithm for this complicated process is the primary goal of the current research so that it can consider the problem’s various dimensions. While many researchers address the critical risk factors (CRFs) and others focus on key performance indicators (KPIs), this research has considered both CRFs and KPIs to choose the best private-sector partner. In addition, we used single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs) to collect decision-makers’ views, which can handle ambiguous, incomplete, or imprecise information. Next, by defining the ideal alternative and using the similarity measure, we specified the ranks of the alternative. Additionally, to face the uncertain environment, we examined the performance of options in four future scenarios. The steps of the proposed algorithm are explained in the form of a numerical example. The results of this research showed that by employing a simple algorithm, even people who do not have significant operations research knowledge could choose the best option by paying attention to the dimensions of the problem complexity.

Environmental Dimension of Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Persistence: An Exploration of the Moderator Roles of Operating Efficiency and Financing Cost

“…Many academic studies have examined the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings quality. Firms that engage in socially responsible activities tend to have a higher earnings quality as they tend to have adopted better corporate governance [89], have higher disclosure and transparency levels, and have a lower risk of suffering from a damaged reputation [90]. Moreover, the firms engaged in CSR may have better access to financing and lower capital costs due to their better reputations and the trust of their stakeholders.…”

Solving the Problem of Reducing the Audiences’ Favor toward an Educational Institution by Using a Combination of Hard and Soft Operations Research Approaches

“…Subsequently, by utilizing the similarity measure, they determined the options ranks. Furthermore, they used the Robustness Analysis to examine the alternatives' effectiveness in various potential scenarios [77]. Researchers combined hard and soft OR techniques to solve a problem related to coordination and conflict in the supply chain.…”

Toward Supply Chain 5.0: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for Sustainable and Resilience Enterprise

“…iv. As [45] explained where there is no analysis of the relationships between the indicators. This weakness can be addressed in future studies through leveraging specialized techniques such as Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and other techniques.…”