1998
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.36.3.820-823.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Technique for Detection of Significant Bacteriuria by Microscopic Examination of Urine

Abstract: A comparative study of microscopic examination of 10 μl (simplified loop technique) and 50 μl (traditional drop technique) of uncentrifuged Gram-stained urine specimens for detection of significant bacteriuria was carried out. The results demonstrated that the 10-μl loop technique can be used as an alternative to the 50-μl drop technique for presumptive diagnosis of urinary-tract infection in bacteriological practice, with the advantages of greater rapidity and ease of performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A urocultura é considerada padrão-ouro no diagnóstico de ITU (Cardoso et al, 2000;Pires et al, 2007). A infecção urinária é caracterizada pelo crescimento de, no mínimo, 100 mil unidades formadoras de colônia (UFC) por mililitro de urina colhida em jato médio e de maneira asséptica (Braoios et al, 2009;CLSI, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A urocultura é considerada padrão-ouro no diagnóstico de ITU (Cardoso et al, 2000;Pires et al, 2007). A infecção urinária é caracterizada pelo crescimento de, no mínimo, 100 mil unidades formadoras de colônia (UFC) por mililitro de urina colhida em jato médio e de maneira asséptica (Braoios et al, 2009;CLSI, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Gram stain examination was having similar sensitivity (96.0%), specificity (99.2%), positive predictive value (97.6%) and negative predictive value (98.7%) according to a study conducted by Celso Lui´Z Cardoso et al [38] from Brazil (2006). Another study conducted by Taneja et al [39] showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of wet film examination for pyuria to be 68.4%, 60.8%, 32.7% and 87.3% respectively.…”
Section: Critical Care Obstetrics and Gynecology Issn 2471-9803mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For physicians, this should mean prompt reporting of normal specimens and improvement in the quality of patient care. Over the past decade several rapid screening methods have been reported, including semiautomated microscopy combined with reagent strip chemical determinations (Yellow IRIS) (1), reagent strip chemical determinations alone (Clinitek 200) (2), detection of catalase activity (Uriscreen) (6), and microscopic examination of Gram-stained unspun urine (3). Results for the detection of significant bacteriuria by these methods were compared with reference urine culture results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%