SAE Technical Paper Series 2006
DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-2349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified MADYMO Model of the IHRA Head-form Impactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In general, the rules indicate the characteristics of the dummies for crash evaluation, [36][37][38][39] or the impactor characteristics for the head and leg injury evaluation. [40][41][42] The teenager anthropomorphic model is defined a previous paper 1 as a derivation of the adult dummy representing the 50th percentile. The applied simulation method is a multibody technique; the most widely used programs are MADYMO, Aprosys and PC Crash, while Simpack is used in 12 and SimWise is effectively used in this paper, using the indirect approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In general, the rules indicate the characteristics of the dummies for crash evaluation, [36][37][38][39] or the impactor characteristics for the head and leg injury evaluation. [40][41][42] The teenager anthropomorphic model is defined a previous paper 1 as a derivation of the adult dummy representing the 50th percentile. The applied simulation method is a multibody technique; the most widely used programs are MADYMO, Aprosys and PC Crash, while Simpack is used in 12 and SimWise is effectively used in this paper, using the indirect approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the output of the model, the referent acceleration data from the head-drop test that was compared to the model output was taken from Sulzer et al ( 23 ). The acceleration profi le and the HIC score from the head-drop test, the model presented in Sulzer et al, and the model presented here were compared for a drop height of 376 mm, which corresponds to an impact velocity of 2.71 m z s 2 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 . Data for a higher input velocity case, 3.13 m z s 2 1 , were also compared against the model output ( 23 ). For this input velocity, the model shows a 2 4.7% error in peak acceleration and a 2 2.5% error in HIC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations