2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Analysis for Preliminary Design of Towers in Suspension Bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the main cable in each span is supported by fixed hinges, the equivalent horizontal force under dead load and live load can be calculated by assuming δ R δ L = 0 ( 17 ).…”
Section: Simplified Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the main cable in each span is supported by fixed hinges, the equivalent horizontal force under dead load and live load can be calculated by assuming δ R δ L = 0 ( 17 ).…”
Section: Simplified Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the finite element model (FEM), the analytical model has the advantages of low calculation expense, convenient parameter discussion, and high accuracy and is widely used in the preliminary design stage of suspension bridges, providing a reference for the selection of bridge structural parameters (Choi et al, 2014;Zhang et al 2019bZhang et al , 2021cZhou et al, 2021). The deflection theory has been one of the most popular analytical methods, with a suitable numerical solution method (Del Arco and Aparicio 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify the solution of the differential equation of the stiffening girder, researchers often neglect the vertical stiffness contribution of the stiffening girder when establishing the simplified suspension bridge model and focus on solving the deformation of the main cable. Choi et al (2014) proposed the calculation formula of the equivalent horizontal stiffness of the main cable based on the conservation of the unstrained length. They applied it to the preliminary analysis of the suspension bridge tower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-tower suspension bridges have attracted intensive attention due to a much smaller bridge tower height, main cable area, and anchorage volume than traditional suspension bridges with the same structural parameters and the sum of spans. The well-known three-tower suspension bridges include the Taizhou Yangtze River Bridge (390 m + 2 × 1080 m + 390 m) (Zhang et al, 2015), the Maanshan Bridge (360 m + 2 × 1080 m + 360 m) (Zhang et al, 2012), the Yingwuzhou Yangtze River Bridge (225 m + 2 × 850 m + 225 m) (Cao et al, 2017), the New Millennium Bridge (225 m + 2 × 650 m + 225 m) (Choi et al, 2014), and the Oujiang Beikou Bridge (230 m + 2 × 800 + 348m ) (Cheng et al, 2020). However, it is difficult for the main cables on both sides of the mid-tower to provide effective horizontal restraints to resist live loads, and the excessive stiffness of the mid-tower leads to relative slippage between the main cable and the saddle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%