2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified accelerated particle swarm optimisation algorithm for efficient maximum power point tracking in partially shaded photovoltaic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four different algorithms were tested, and the experimental results are shown in Figure 13. The output PV power of the proposed APSO algorithm is about 76.51 W and reaches GMPP within 2.3 s. On the other hand, the standard PSO method arrived to the GMPP with convergence time 4.2 s and with 72.17 W. It takes 3.2 s to acquire the GMPP with Simplified PSO method [36] and PV output power is about 76.39 W. The P&O method got caught in one of the local MPPs and PV output power is about 44.1 W. Table 2 summarized the comparison experimental results of four MPPT algorithm. Scenario 2: In this scenario, PV output has three MPPs, and the GMPP occurs in the highest voltage at V = 32V (As shown in Figure 10).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Four different algorithms were tested, and the experimental results are shown in Figure 13. The output PV power of the proposed APSO algorithm is about 76.51 W and reaches GMPP within 2.3 s. On the other hand, the standard PSO method arrived to the GMPP with convergence time 4.2 s and with 72.17 W. It takes 3.2 s to acquire the GMPP with Simplified PSO method [36] and PV output power is about 76.39 W. The P&O method got caught in one of the local MPPs and PV output power is about 44.1 W. Table 2 summarized the comparison experimental results of four MPPT algorithm. Scenario 2: In this scenario, PV output has three MPPs, and the GMPP occurs in the highest voltage at V = 32V (As shown in Figure 10).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The conventional PSO algorithm took longer time with 4.6 s and GMPP is about 39.44 W (Figure 9b). On the other hand, it takes 3.2 s to reach GMPP using Simplified PSO method in [36] with PV output power 40.37 W (Figure 9c). However, the P&O algorithm got trapped at the right local MPP with 35.87 W (Figure 9d).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Any multivariable function can be optimized to a maximum or minimum value using this metaheuristic technique. [84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93] An optimum solution is obtained using the operating particles that move on the search space with a velocity and exchange the information of the fitness using Equations (21) and (22) and graphically shown in Figure 25:…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimization Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%