Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 1965
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3108-7_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Technique for the Ultrapurification of Helium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of resonant frequencies with and without cold trap is shown in figure 8. The relative frequency shift (0.5 ppb ± 0.5 ppb), compatible with zero, confirms the assumption that the gas quality is indistinguishable in both cases, as in Pitre et al [25] and Purer et al [41]. The good agreement with and without cold trap proves that the concentrations of hydrogen and neon can be safely neglected.…”
Section: Gas Handling and Pressure Measurementsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A comparison of resonant frequencies with and without cold trap is shown in figure 8. The relative frequency shift (0.5 ppb ± 0.5 ppb), compatible with zero, confirms the assumption that the gas quality is indistinguishable in both cases, as in Pitre et al [25] and Purer et al [41]. The good agreement with and without cold trap proves that the concentrations of hydrogen and neon can be safely neglected.…”
Section: Gas Handling and Pressure Measurementsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, in a previous publication [10], we compared the present cold trap (a simple cylinder of volume 4 cm 3 directly in contact with the liquid helium at 4 K) to a second cold trap, of volume 10 cm 3 and filled with charcoal that had a much larger surface at 4 K. Averaged over several hours, the square of the speed of sound in the helium gas delivered by the two cold traps differed by no more than 0.03 parts in 10 6 , demonstrating the equivalence of the two cold traps. Others have shown [22] that charcoal-filled cold traps reduced the neon concentration in helium to 210 9 , even when the traps were at much higher temperature, near 35 K. Finally, we note that Gavioso et al [14] had three samples of commercially purified helium analyzed for neon; the largest mole fraction that they reported was xneon = (0.07 ± 0.02) µmol mol 1 .…”
Section: Cold Trap Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 56%