2021
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple rules for sensemaking praxis: How HR can contribute to strategic change by developing sensemaking capability in organisations

Abstract: This paper explores how sensemaking theory offers a new perspective on HR's role during strategic change. As change in organisations today is less of a programme and more of a continuous cycle of business transformation, there has been a shift in focus to its underpinning, cognitive process of sensemaking. However, HR's role in developing sensemaking praxis in organisations is not widely researched to date. This paper addresses that gap. We draw on Eisenhardt and Sull's 'simple rules' whereby complex strategy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies (Wang et al , 2019; Kumar, 2020; Kieran et al , 2022) have adopted sensemaking theory to argue for dynamic challenges organizations and individuals face. For instance, Genius and Bronstein (2017), Christianson and Barton (2021) used sensemaking to study blockchain before COVID-19 and supply chain health-care disruption during COVID-19, respectively.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (Wang et al , 2019; Kumar, 2020; Kieran et al , 2022) have adopted sensemaking theory to argue for dynamic challenges organizations and individuals face. For instance, Genius and Bronstein (2017), Christianson and Barton (2021) used sensemaking to study blockchain before COVID-19 and supply chain health-care disruption during COVID-19, respectively.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Oliveira and Handfield ( 2017 ) suggest that open communication with suppliers can improve risk perception. However, despite growing acknowledgement of and interest in the use of enactment theory and sensemaking within organizational research, the literature is still in its infancy (Kieran, MacMahon and MacCurtain, 2022 ; Sarafan, Squire and Brandon‐Jones, 2019 ). Specifically, the understanding of how sensemaking can assist managerial risk perception and decision‐making within organizational resilience is absent.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enactment theory (Weick, 1995(Weick, , 2001 has been regarded as a rich theoretical background to showcase the behavioural process of managerial risk decision-making during equivocal environments (Ellis, Shockley and Henry, 2011;Olcott and Oliver, 2014;Sarafan, Squire and Brandon-Jones, 2019). It proposes that experiences shaped by psychological and social processes determine how individuals and organizations 'make sense' of their environments (Kieran, MacMahon and MacCurtain, 2022;Mayson and Barrett, 2017;Weick, 1995Weick, , 2001. Sensemaking, being the foundation of enactment theory, is explained through its closedloop socio-psychological process comprising enactment (i.e.…”
Section: Enactment Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensemaking approach (Weick, 2012;Sandberg and Tsoukas, 2015) offers a way to examine both individual and organisational levels (Kieran et al, 2022) of identity as they coevolve. Sensemaking is "a socially constructed process in which individuals interact with their environment and with others to create meaning, and enable action" (Christianson and Barton, 2021, p. 572).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensemaking approach (Weick, 2012; Sandberg and Tsoukas, 2015) offers a way to examine both individual and organisational levels (Kieran et al. , 2022) of identity as they coevolve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%