1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002270050446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple molecular method to distinguish the identity of Calanus species (Copepoda: Calanoida) at any developmental stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results mtDNA and nucDNA (microsatellites) genetic variationAs per past studies (Lindeque et al 1999;Parent et al 2011), variation at mtDNA clearly discriminated C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis. Among all samples, we detected 486 and 198 individuals with C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis mtDNA haplotypes, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Results mtDNA and nucDNA (microsatellites) genetic variationAs per past studies (Lindeque et al 1999;Parent et al 2011), variation at mtDNA clearly discriminated C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis. Among all samples, we detected 486 and 198 individuals with C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis mtDNA haplotypes, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This means that routine identification of species based on threshold prosome length criteria (Unstad and Tande 1991;Hirche et al 1994) is more likely to confound hybrids with the larger C. glacialis than with C. finmarchicus. Also, the intermediate prosome length of some hybrids may partly explain the overlapping prosome length distribution previously documented on the basis of mtDNA species identification (Lindeque et al 2004;Parent et al 2011). Interestingly, a strong contribution of C. glacialis genes seems to result in hybrids having that species' phenotype, as if the contribution of C. finmarchicus was masked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations