2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3626460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple model of bulk and surface excitation effects to inelastic scattering in low-energy electron beam irradiation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Abstract: The effect of bulk and surface excitations to inelastic scattering in low-energy electron beam irradiation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) is studied using the dielectric formalism. Calculations are based on a semiempirical dielectric response function for MWCNTs determined by means of a many-pole plasmon model with parameters adjusted to available experimental spectroscopic data under theoretical sum-rule constrains. Finite-size effects are considered in the context of electron gas theory via a bound… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We describe the material response in terms of a plasmon‐pole approximation to the dielectric function earlier considered, for example, by Ritchie and Howie . As usual, we start from the optical case (zero momentum transfer trueq) and we extend it to the general case, italicqtrue→0, assuming a trueq dependence able to provide the energy‐momentum dispersion characteristic of collective excitations at low momentum transfer and of single particle excitations at high momentum transfer . The position‐dependent IIMFP is calculated without any simplifying assumption on the momentum transfer dependence of the dielectric function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe the material response in terms of a plasmon‐pole approximation to the dielectric function earlier considered, for example, by Ritchie and Howie . As usual, we start from the optical case (zero momentum transfer trueq) and we extend it to the general case, italicqtrue→0, assuming a trueq dependence able to provide the energy‐momentum dispersion characteristic of collective excitations at low momentum transfer and of single particle excitations at high momentum transfer . The position‐dependent IIMFP is calculated without any simplifying assumption on the momentum transfer dependence of the dielectric function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Therefore, we here employ a many-pole plasmon model of electronic excitations in MWCNTs that permits, within the plane-wave Born approximation (PWBA), the calculation of differential and total inelastic electron-electron scattering cross sections from first-principles. 29,30 Model parameters associated with the energy, damping rate, and strength of the various excitation modes of the target are determined from spectroscopy data (see Ref. 30 and references therein) under the perfectscreening and Thomas-Reich-Kuhn sum-rule constraints, thus ensuring a realistic and self-consistent description of the electronic excitation properties of MWCNTs over the whole x-k plane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Model parameters associated with the energy, damping rate, and strength of the various excitation modes of the target are determined from spectroscopy data (see Ref. 30 and references therein) under the perfectscreening and Thomas-Reich-Kuhn sum-rule constraints, thus ensuring a realistic and self-consistent description of the electronic excitation properties of MWCNTs over the whole x-k plane. To go beyond the standard bulk models of particle-solid interaction or the local dielectric models often used for nanostructures, 31 explicitly considered in the model via the analytic extension of eðx; kÞ at k 6 ¼ 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction of primary electron beams with carbon nanotubes has also been studied extensively using the dielectric response function, with focus on inelastic scattering of electrons with primary energies of less than 30 keV, which are those typically relevant to SEM [134,135]. The findings have been used in a Monte Carlo framework to simulate electron transport and energy dissipation in collections of multiwalled carbon nanotubes [136].…”
Section: Secondary Emission From Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%