Simple method for the determination of trace levels of pesticides in honeybees using matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography

Morzycka, B.

doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01505-4

Cited by 85 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Chromatographic techniques are the most commonly used tools to determine pesticide residues. [7][8][9][10][11] In recent years pre-concentration methods and sample cleanup steps such as quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS), 12 microwave assisted extraction, 13 extraction with an ionic liquid, 14 solid phase extraction, 15 solid phase microextraction 16 and matrix solid phase dispersion 17 were employed with good results. No electroanalytical procedure was found in literature for the fipronil determination.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical and Quantum Chemical Investigations of the Insecticide Fipronil

Okumura

Amaral

Orestes

et al. 2015

Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work describes an electrochemical and quantum chemical investigation of the fipronil insecticide. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and square wave voltammetry (SWV) experiments were performed over a graphite-polyurethane (GPU) composite electrode. The fipronil molecule presents an one-electron irreversible oxidation reaction. Profiting the SWV signal a square wave stripping voltammetry (SWSV) procedure to determine the fipronil molecule in a 0.10 mol L

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical and Quantum Chemical Investigations of the Insecticide Fipronil

Okumura

Amaral

Orestes

et al. 2015

Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The relative standard deviations were in the range of 2-8% for all pesticides studied. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.005-0.05 mg/kg [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Analysis of Insecticides in Body Fluids: A Review

Mishra¹

2014

J Chromatogr Sep Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysis of insecticides in body fluids is the choice of research from very long time before to know the impact of its on living beings. The analytical methods of insecticides have been improved in last few years by advance and sophisticated techniques. The analysis of insecticides in urine and visceral samples are preferred among other body fluids as drugs and its metabolites found in urine are usually stable and are present in higher concentration as compared to other biological fluids. These are also detectable for a relatively longer period of time. Several techniques for the qualitative as well as quantitative analysis of insecticides are reviewed in this paper ranging from conventional chromatographic methods to the modern GC-MS methods, in order to suggest a better, efficient, fast and result oriented method that can be utilized in future work of analysis.

show abstract

“…Fipronil has been detected in soil and water samples by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GC-MS), 5,6 LC-UV 7 and GC with electron-capture detection (ECD). 8 Its determination has also been widely described in honeybees, honey and pollen samples by GC with nitrogen phosphorous detection (NPD), 9 LC with tandem mass spectrometry detection (MS/MS), 10 GC-ECD/MS [11][12][13] and LC-UV.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, there are few studies that describe determination of fipronil in plasma samples using GC-MS/MS, 17 LC-UV/MS, 18 and GC-MS. 19 Concerning sample preparation, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) 6,7 and SPE 10,12,[15][16][17][18] are generally used, however solid-phase micro extraction (SPME), 5 gel permeation chromatography (GPC), 8 Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) 14 and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) 9,11,13,19 have also been used. In analytical methods, the customary procedure is the IS method, where a compound that is not part of the sample (IS) is added at known and constant concentrations to the sample before performing the analysis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of fipronil in bovine plasma by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recebido em 7/3/12; aceito em 9/7/12; publicado na web em 25/9/12 A fast and efficient method has been developed and validated for the determination of fipronil in bovine plasma. Samples were subjected to solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by reversed phase liquid chromatography (LC) separation, using acetonitrile/ water (60:40 v/v) as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and ultraviolet (UV) detection at 210 nm. Ethiprole was used as the internal standard (IS). The method was found to be linear over the range 5-500 ng/mL (r = 0.999). The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was validated at 5 ng/mL. The method was successfully applied to monitor plasma concentrations following subcutaneous administration of fipronil in cattle.

show abstract

Simple method for the determination of trace levels of pesticides in honeybees using matrix solid-phase dispersion and gas chromatography

Cited by 85 publications

References 12 publications

Electrochemical and Quantum Chemical Investigations of the Insecticide Fipronil

Electrochemical and Quantum Chemical Investigations of the Insecticide Fipronil

Analysis of Insecticides in Body Fluids: A Review

Determination of fipronil in bovine plasma by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About