1991
DOI: 10.3406/linx.1991.1227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple, le français populaire ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of other non-standard features present; the question is, if these features are not related to the regional substrate, what are theyOE Most of them could be described as 'connected speech processes' (cf. Armstrong, 2001: 84), or facilités de prononciation, as Gadet (1989Gadet ( , 1992 has termed them, such as elision of schwa and liquids, cluster reductions and intersegmental coordination processes such as voicing assimilation (Coveney, 2001: 139-140;Laver, 1994), which readily occur in all but the most formal (especially scripted) styles of spoken French. Such features are therefore generally associated with français familier, but when they occur with great frequency, this can lead to characterisation of the variety (and the speaker) as populaire (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of other non-standard features present; the question is, if these features are not related to the regional substrate, what are theyOE Most of them could be described as 'connected speech processes' (cf. Armstrong, 2001: 84), or facilités de prononciation, as Gadet (1989Gadet ( , 1992 has termed them, such as elision of schwa and liquids, cluster reductions and intersegmental coordination processes such as voicing assimilation (Coveney, 2001: 139-140;Laver, 1994), which readily occur in all but the most formal (especially scripted) styles of spoken French. Such features are therefore generally associated with français familier, but when they occur with great frequency, this can lead to characterisation of the variety (and the speaker) as populaire (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il est parti avec Ø.) og kun har kunnet traekke på fragmentariske bemaerkninger i Guiraud (1978Guiraud ( [1965) og Gadet (1992). Vi har med andre ord ikke kunnet understøtte disse betragtninger med empiriske variationistiske studier som ved modusvariationen.…”
Section: Konklusionunclassified
“…Nous retrouvons ainsi dans cette variété de français la tendance à la fixité de l'ordre SVO observée en français ordinaire et populaire (Gadet, 1989(Gadet, et 1992. Cette tendance se manifeste en ce qui concerne les pronoms clitiques sujets par l'absence d'enclise et pour les clitiques objets par la réduction des séquences de clitiques devant le verbe en faveur de l'emploi d'un pronom tonique postposé ou de l'effacement du pronom objet.…”
Section: Quelle Analyse Pour Les Pronoms Clitiques Cadiens?unclassified