2014
DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0130118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Culture System for Bobwhite Quail and Japanese Quail Embryos from the Blastoderm Stage to Hatching using a Single Surrogate Eggshell

Abstract: The ex vivo culture of avian embryos is a technique for the long-term culturing of embryos outside of their own shell and shell membrane. It allows easy access to the developing embryos and embryo manipulation. The two-step system is widely applied when the culture is performed after oviposition. Japanese quail as well as bobwhite quail are used as models for avian safety assessment as recommended by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. However, biological studies on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted age at hatch of around 20 days matches the average incubation duration of 23 days at 37.5 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$^{\circ }$\end{document} C–38.5 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$^{\circ }$\end{document} C ( Green & Vince, 1973 , Kato et al , 2013 , 2014 , Reyna, 2019 , Reyna & Burggren, 2017 , Walter & Voitle, 1973 ). Predicted wet weight at hatch of 6.7 g is only 3.5% larger compared with the data used for parameterizing the model (Table 3 ) and is close to the average hatching mass (6–6.5 g; Brennan et al , 2020 , Walter & Voitle, 1973 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted age at hatch of around 20 days matches the average incubation duration of 23 days at 37.5 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$^{\circ }$\end{document} C–38.5 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$^{\circ }$\end{document} C ( Green & Vince, 1973 , Kato et al , 2013 , 2014 , Reyna, 2019 , Reyna & Burggren, 2017 , Walter & Voitle, 1973 ). Predicted wet weight at hatch of 6.7 g is only 3.5% larger compared with the data used for parameterizing the model (Table 3 ) and is close to the average hatching mass (6–6.5 g; Brennan et al , 2020 , Walter & Voitle, 1973 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%