The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2013
DOI: 10.1021/ie401018g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Analytic Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Controller Tuning Rules for Unstable Processes

Abstract: Very simple proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller tuning rules for a wide range of stable processes are available. However, for unstable processes, the design trend is for controllers to be more complex for better performances. Here, the design concept of "simplicity" is extended to unstable processes. Simple desired closed-loop transfer functions for the direct synthesis method and simple approximations of the process time delay are utilized for unstable processes. Very simple tuning rules for PID… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It requires a set point filter of F R ( s ) = (λ s + 1)/(β s + 1) to reduce overshoot for step set-point changes. 29 The design parameter, λ is set to 3θ.…”
Section: Identification and Tuning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires a set point filter of F R ( s ) = (λ s + 1)/(β s + 1) to reduce overshoot for step set-point changes. 29 The design parameter, λ is set to 3θ.…”
Section: Identification and Tuning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the developed methods mainly concerned only on the system performance, such minimizing integrated error criteria as developed by Murrill et al (1967) [11] or Rovira et al (1969) [12], or the more recent work by Awouda and Mamat (2010) [13]. There are also tuning methods concidered the unstable FOPDT process, ranging from relatively simple analytic tuning formula [14], to more complex techniques algorithm [15]. A drawback of those tuning rules is that such rules do not consider load disturbance, model uncertainty, and measurement noise, since tuning for high performance is always accompanied by low robustness.…”
Section: Robust Pid Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant research line is the set of tuning rules that proposes a tradeoff between performance and robustness, or between servo and regulation modes [11,18]. There are also tuning rules specifically developed for unstable FOPTD processes, ranging from relatively simple analytic tuning formulae [19] to more complex techniques using evolutionary or heuristic algorithms [20,21]. Nevertheless, as mentioned before, a great majority of tuning rules is based on FOPTD models [7,22], and there are extensions to other structures, such as the second order plus dead time (SOPDT), the integrator plus dead time (IPDT), and the first order and integrator plus dead time (FOIDT).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%