2018
DOI: 10.3390/sym10110569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Tuning Tool of Proportional-Integral Controllers for First Order Plus Time Delay Processes

Abstract: Engineering education and, particularly, control engineering, has shown growth in research and development activities during last years. Currently, proportional–integral (PI) and proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controllers are the most commonly used in industrial process applications. Nonetheless, it is reported that many of them are badly tuned. From an educational perspective, it is crucial for the student to understand the importance of tuning a control loop correctly. This paper presents an interact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggested AMIGO tuning rules for PID controller of FOPDT model as mentioned in [17] are, Meanwhile, AMIGO tuning rules for PI controller as shown in [19] are,…”
Section: Robust Pid Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suggested AMIGO tuning rules for PID controller of FOPDT model as mentioned in [17] are, Meanwhile, AMIGO tuning rules for PI controller as shown in [19] are,…”
Section: Robust Pid Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determinant of choosing PI or PID controller is depend on performance characteristic in design process [19]. If the Derivative-term (D) is present in controller, the high frequency noise is highly amplified, hence the closed-loop system will sensitive to noise measurement.…”
Section: Robust Pid Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular controllers used for tracking of the grid-connected inverter output current are proportional-integral (PI) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], proportional-integral-derivative (PID) [3,21,26,27], and proportional-resonant (PR) [2,15,21,[28][29][30][31][32] controllers. However, more sophisticated predictive current controllers can be used as well [4,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of proposed controller with other more advanced controllers that can be used for current control, e.g., with proportional-resonant and predictive current controllers was not analyzed in this work because they are less popular in microinverter applications. On the other hand, it is self-evident without analysis that these controllers provide lower current distortions and lower steady-state error, but their implementation is more complicated [4,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Monte Carlo For the tracking and adaptive cruise control of an intelligent vehicle, the proportion integration differentiation (PID) control is a control loop mechanism employing feedback that is widely used in industrial control systems and a variety of other applications requiring continuously modulated control. It has been the classic type of controller since the mid-20th century and will continue as the most often used industrial control scheme, due to its remarkable effectiveness, simple implementation, and broad applicability [6,7]. However, the parameter setting processing of conventional PID controllers is very complicated and the results are hard to be satisfactory, which might cause a great waste of manpower, material resources, and equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%