Simon Rabinovitch. Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014. 374 pp.

Horowitz, Brian

doi:10.1017/s0364009415000227

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Firmly rooting his theory in the history of the centuries-old selfruling Jewish communities, Dubnow, in a marked similarity to Renner and Bauer's ideas, suggested that Jews in the Russian Empire should demand not only civil equality for individual citizens, but also national, or collective, rights. 4 In essence, Dubnow applied the territorial demands made by other national minorities in the Russian Empire to the 'nonterritorial' situation of the Russian Jews, calling for Jewish autonomy in the matters of education, culture, and communal welfare, as well as to self-taxation (Rabinovitch, 2014).…”

Section: Ethnic and Linguistic Diversity In The Russian Empiresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Territorial Autonomy

Suksi¹

2015

Minority Accommodation Through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Science and Technology). COST is a funding agency for research and innovation networks, connecting research initiatives across Europe and enabling scientists to grow their ideas by sharing them with their peers.ENTAN involved scholars from 36 countries who were organized in different thematic working groups. One of the working groups, chaired by Assoc. Prof. Marina Andeva (University American College Skopje) and vice-chaired by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Börries Kuzmany (University of Vienna), aimed at systematizing the findings and insights gathered from the whole network to produce a comprehensive bibliography of academic writings, research projects, teaching courses, and other materials in the field of minority rights and NTA. Moreover, the working group was tasked to design a university course that would bring the subject closer to the students in a multidisciplinary perspective. Eventually, the present textbook was developed as a systematic and comprehensive teaching tool. The chapters included in this textbook are written by members of ENTAN as their contribution to the teaching of the theory and application of NTA in diverse historical and contemporary contexts. vii viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe Management Committee of ENTAN and the editors of the textbook are deeply grateful to the single contributors of the textbook. A special gratitude goes to the external reviewers of the single chapters:

show abstract

Section: Ethnic and Linguistic Diversity In The Russian Empiresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Territorial Autonomy

Suksi¹

2015

Minority Accommodation Through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They developed a national consciousness and sought to achieve, in Leon Pinsker's words, their autoemancipation. 12 Millions immigrated to Western Europe and the United States. Thousands more organized into mutual-aid organizations collectively known as Hovevey Tsion and headed to the Levant.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hadera: transnational migrations from Eastern Europe to Ottoman Palestine and the glocal origins of the Zionist-Arab conflict

Marom

2023

Middle Eastern Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article explores the interplay between transnational migration, cultural patrimony and political conflict, tying together the former realms of the Russian and Ottoman Empires. It discusses the role played by Russian Jews in the development of the Zionist-Arab conflict in Palestine until 1948. It focuses on the Northern Sharon, where three distinct immigrant groups -Circassians, Bosnians and Russian Jews -settled in the 1870s-1890s. Methodologically, it adopts a new, twofold, approach to the genesis of the conflict, by tracing its roots within the broader setting of Eurasian transnational migrations to Palestine, and the stricter context of 'locality expressing glocality', that is, of specific colonies and their development under internal pressures and outside interactions. In 1948, prior actions aimed at achieving ethnic homogeneity through coerced population transfers during the disintegration Eurasian imperial polities served as a blueprint for some of the same Zionist immigrants for achieving plurality in their new Jewish State.This article explores the interplay between transnational migrations, cultural patrimony and political conflict, tying together the former realms of the Russian and Ottoman Empires, in the genesis of the Zionist-Arab conflict in Palestine (henceforth the conflict).Most scholars discuss the origins of the conflict from a national-territorial perspective. 1 The post-colonial turn in Middle Eastern Studies and Palestine Studies inspired other scholars to regard the conflict as a colonial dispute between Zionist 'settler-colonists' and Arab-Palestinian 'natives'. 2 In the current article, I suggest that reading the pre-national past in light of national spatial and ideological notions is both constrictive and anachronistic.Transnational and local factors influenced the relations between Jews and their non-Jewish neighbors long before Palestine's borders were charted. Therefore, I argue for the need to look at the evolution of the conflict beyond the national arena. In structuralist terms, I call on scholars to study the conflict from two hierarchical, thematically contradictory, but narrativelyThe Version f Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Middle Eastern Studies since

show abstract

Simon Rabinovitch. Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014. 374 pp.

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Non-Territorial Autonomy

Non-Territorial Autonomy

Hadera: transnational migrations from Eastern Europe to Ottoman Palestine and the glocal origins of the Zionist-Arab conflict

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About