1989
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-88534-0.50010-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities and Differences in Defect Dependent Properties of Transition Metal Sulphides and Oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, they represent a good diffusion barrier, and the corrosive components cannot easily penetrate the corrosion layer. Finally, yet importantly, the high molybdenum content and the formation of MoS 2 could also improve the protective effect of the corroded zone as found in other research studies [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Comparison Of N10276 With Previously Investigated Steelsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, they represent a good diffusion barrier, and the corrosive components cannot easily penetrate the corrosion layer. Finally, yet importantly, the high molybdenum content and the formation of MoS 2 could also improve the protective effect of the corroded zone as found in other research studies [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Comparison Of N10276 With Previously Investigated Steelsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The only exceptions are slow growing sulfides of Mo, Nb, Mn, and Ta, which have a much lower non-stoichiometry. Research data showed that refractory-metal sulfides, such as MoS 2 , show only small stoichiometric deviations and that sulfidation rates are in the order of Cr 2 O 3 [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%