2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00862.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simian foamy virus infection by whole‐blood transfer in rhesus macaques: potential for transfusion transmission in humans

Abstract: SFV transmission in macaques occurred by transfusion of blood from one of two infected donor animals. These results indicate the potential of SFV transfusion transmission in humans, which may depend on virus-specific or donor-related factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presumed route of transmission is from infectious virions or infected cells in NHP saliva to human blood (10,41). It is not well understood how SFV establishes infection after transmission, but a current model involves SFV entering blood cells where a latent infection is established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presumed route of transmission is from infectious virions or infected cells in NHP saliva to human blood (10,41). It is not well understood how SFV establishes infection after transmission, but a current model involves SFV entering blood cells where a latent infection is established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FV infections are persistent and infected animals show a sustained antibody response against Gag and Bet that is used for serological identification of infected hosts via ELISA and/or immunoblotting ( , [Hahn et al, 1994], [Heneine et al, 2003], [Khan and Kumar, 2006], [Saib, 2003] and [Williams and Khan, 2010]). Virus can commonly be isolated from infected cats, cattle and non-human primates ( , [Heneine et al, 2003], [Khan and Kumar, 2006], [Romen et al, 2007], [Saib, 2003] and [Williams and Khan, 2010]); however, no disease was associated with infections and thus, FVs are therefore considered apathogenic ( [Linial, 2000] and [Saib, 2003]). In addition, zoonotic infections of human beings by simian FVs have been described but are not associated with an overt disease ( [Heneine et al, 2003] and [Khan, 2009]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monkey injections and blood transfusions. The source of the animals, retrovirus screening, and maintenance of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) at the FDA animal facility (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) were previously described (36). The animals, designated DBL2, DBNP, DBHH, DBHE, DBLZ, DBCF, and DBHT, were adults at the time of this study and had previously tested negative for type D simian retrovirus (SRV), simian T-cell lymphotropic virus (STLV), and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) based upon serology and further tested negative for SRV based upon a PCR assay and virus isolation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%