“…While LTPS TFTs are advantageous for achieving high refresh rates due to their high carrier mobility, the drawback of LTPS TFTs is that signals should be sent at a minimum rate of 60 Hz to prevent luminance reduction and flickering caused by a high leakage current. Combining LTPS TFTs with AOS TFTs makes it possible to achieve both high refresh rates and low leakage current, making LTPO a promising driving method for UHR displays. , However, for UHR display panels intended for head-mounted display applications, at least 3000 PPI or higher pixel density is required. , Therefore, there is a growing demand for oxide semiconductor TFTs that not only exhibit low off-current characteristics but also possess a higher mobility and stable bias stability. In addition, during the fabrication process of LTPO, concerns arise regarding the degradation of electrical performance and bias stability in oxide semiconductors due to the inflow and outflow of hydrogen resulting from the LTPS passivation and gate insulator deposition processes. ,, Hydrogen plays a dual role in oxide semiconductors, passivating interface defects, , oxygen vacancies, and weakly bonded states while also generating hydroxyl-related defects and simultaneously causing the formation of oxygen vacancies and donor-like defects, which results in excessive carrier and threshold voltage shift .…”