2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8535.00316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon Valley versus Silicon Glen: the impact of computers upon teaching and learning: a comparative study

Abstract: Drawing on data from a major survey on the impact of information technology initiatives on Scottish schools, we assess the extent to which the outcomes resemble those that have already been reported by Larry Cuban in his study of schools in Silicon Valley. We find a large measure of agreement. Scottish teachers and school students mostly have access to computers in their homes and classrooms. The home computers appear to be frequently used. The classroom computers, however, are encountered by students only sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In foreign language settings that the exposure to the target language is very difficult, CMC can provide the learners with more opportunities to engage in authentic and genuine communication that is characterized by "the uneven distribution of information, the negotiation of meaning through clarification requests and confirmation checks, topic nomination and negotiation by more than one speaker, and the right of interlocutors to decide whether to contribute to an interaction or not" (Nunan, 1987: 137). However, recent studies point to the teacher as the main factor in utilizing technology in classroom amongst the organizational and environmental barriers and factors (Schofield, 1995 Conlon & Simpson, 2003). Teachers" beliefs and perceptions define their actual practices while teaching target language and employing instructional methods (Staub & Stern, 2002).…”
Section: A Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In foreign language settings that the exposure to the target language is very difficult, CMC can provide the learners with more opportunities to engage in authentic and genuine communication that is characterized by "the uneven distribution of information, the negotiation of meaning through clarification requests and confirmation checks, topic nomination and negotiation by more than one speaker, and the right of interlocutors to decide whether to contribute to an interaction or not" (Nunan, 1987: 137). However, recent studies point to the teacher as the main factor in utilizing technology in classroom amongst the organizational and environmental barriers and factors (Schofield, 1995 Conlon & Simpson, 2003). Teachers" beliefs and perceptions define their actual practices while teaching target language and employing instructional methods (Staub & Stern, 2002).…”
Section: A Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Students are more active in computer-aided language lessons. 14 Using a computer makes language lessons more interesting to the students.…”
Section: Appendixesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though many teachers do not ignore possible benefits of using digital resources to help students' academic achievement, several studies indicate teachers may be reluctant to use or integrate technology to support their classes (Conlon & Simpson, 2003;Cuban, 2001;Watson, 2001). Among several reasons, not knowing how to effectively use technology can be cited as a major cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Snapshot Survey data from 3,665 teachers in California, Florida, Nebraska, and New York, Norris et al (2003) found that technology use was almost exclusively a function of access, to the exclusion of the individual differences of teachers. Conlon and Simpson (2003) have also found that individual differences among teachers, with respect to computers, appears to be fading as more computers are found, and frequently used, in teachers' homes in Scotland.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%