1996 Symposium on VLSI Technology. Digest of Technical Papers
DOI: 10.1109/vlsit.1996.507810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon RF devices fabricated by ULSI processes featuring 0.1-μm SOI-CMOS and suspended inductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported here is comparable to that of SiGe bipolar transistors with an of 90 GHz [7] and is lower than MOSFETs with higher [5], [6], including a bulk-Si T-gate MOSFET [4] as well as a 0.1-m gate length partially-depleted SOI [8]. The noise power generated in our n-MOSFET, using the formula in [5], is 166 dBm/Hz, which is better than the 165 dBm/Hz for a GaAs MESFET and comparable to the 171 dBm/Hz for bulk-Si MOSFETs [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The reported here is comparable to that of SiGe bipolar transistors with an of 90 GHz [7] and is lower than MOSFETs with higher [5], [6], including a bulk-Si T-gate MOSFET [4] as well as a 0.1-m gate length partially-depleted SOI [8]. The noise power generated in our n-MOSFET, using the formula in [5], is 166 dBm/Hz, which is better than the 165 dBm/Hz for a GaAs MESFET and comparable to the 171 dBm/Hz for bulk-Si MOSFETs [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…2. The proton fluence was set to 0018-9383/01$10.00 © 2001 IEEE 10 10 cm at 15 MeV to simulate dose of the proton bombardment during the integration process. The projected range of the 15 MeV proton was approximately 1500 m, which was much larger than the thickness of silicon wafers used in this experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooling water ran through the inner layer of the aluminum mask to maintain the mask at the room temperature. For the direct-write study, the proton fluence was chosen to be 10 10 cm and also at 15 MeV. No masks were used and wafers of resistivities of 15, 70, and 140 -cm, which were relatively higher than the 3 5 -cm resistivity of the conventional wafer, were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%