2014
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2014.2321574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon Photonic Transceiver Circuits With Microring Resonator Bias-Based Wavelength Stabilization in 65 nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as is shown in Fig 1(c) [8], it has been demonstrated that a cascaded push-pull driver can supply a large output swing without using a external biasing network. However, the low speed PMOS transistor in the top of output stage always limits the driver's speed of operation, and the two independent pre-drivers have to be created at different voltage level for the top and bottom input signals (Vin_high and Vin_low).…”
Section: A Design Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as is shown in Fig 1(c) [8], it has been demonstrated that a cascaded push-pull driver can supply a large output swing without using a external biasing network. However, the low speed PMOS transistor in the top of output stage always limits the driver's speed of operation, and the two independent pre-drivers have to be created at different voltage level for the top and bottom input signals (Vin_high and Vin_low).…”
Section: A Design Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only because of critical design specifications in bandwidth, voltage swing and power consumption, but also due to the requirement of a high density, low cost integration approach. As shown in Fig 1, previous recent work has demonstrated silicon photonic transmitters with a frontend based on a vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) [9], ring resonator modulator(RRM) [8] and Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) [2][4] [7]. Although the MZM approach has lower power efficiency compared to other two approaches [6], the relatively large bandwidth and improved tolerance to process and temperature variation make it attractive for low cost silicon photonic transceivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brute-force BER testing method is unaffordably time-consuming (over 100 seconds for 10 −12 BER at 10Gbps data rate) for the proposed adaptive tuning. Fortunately, there are fast BER estimation methods that leverage voltage offsetting or sampling time offsetting [28], [29]. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Adaptive Tuning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware overhead, mainly in the BER monitor, includes an additional comparator with offset control and a small logic circuit, which takes about 30 µm x 30 µm area for a 65 nm CMOS technology [28]. For a multi-receiver link, its hardware cost can be amortized by sharing the BER monitor, as the multiple receivers on one link cannot receive signal simultaneously.…”
Section: Adaptive Tuning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in silicon (Si) photonic devices, such as microring resonators (MRRs), control issues become even more critical because of the wavelength selectivity of the MRR response and the high temperature dependence of the Si waveguides [10][11][12][13][14][15]. When managing architectures integrating many MRRs [16][17][18], it is challenging to identify the current resonant wavelength of each MRR in order to tune and lock their spectral response to the wavelengths of the incoming optical signals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%